them combos was vicious
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
them combos was vicious
It's a good point, but it's a very unpopular point, so you will get thrashed.
Boxing fans don't want to hear this stuff. They have "golden-age fever". Unless you want to talk about how great the old guys were, how tough they were, how they'd make our modern fighters look foolish in the ring, your opinion is not wanted.
There are guys on here who will argue the virtues of a guy they've never even seen fight. They'll tell you how fighter x who they've never seen would have whipped a guy like Pernell Whitaker, Roy Jones, or Floyd Mayweather.
It's just nonsense.
Array
With all due respect...I have asked this before and I ask again...What is your boxing history? I understand that it is natural to think most highly of the guys you watched as you learned, I did that myself...
If Mayweather were to fight Robinson, he would not be able to lay back and pick his spots. He would have to fight. When he fought, he would get hit and hurt. Then he would get defensive. Robinson would probably stop him, though Mayweather could hang on to the end, if he kept within himself. If he fights, he gets stopped, and he'll have to fight.
Array
Yet another fishing expedition. As much as some of us may overestimate the written word of boxing history lacking in film evidence to prove so also do many underestimate fighters and eras past and the incredible pace they had to contend with. Just as is the case with much of history, the cameras were not around. That in and of itself is not proof that historians are wrong. Nothing will be solved in this thread anymore then it did in all those threads that came before it on the same subject matter. W/o a time machine its futile![]()
Array
My problem is not so much with what can or can't be proven, but with the fallacies that boxing fans use regarding the old timers and the inconsistent criteria that is used to judge old and modern fighters.
We are completely unrelenting in our demands for fighters to constantly prove their worth to us. We don't care about potential, or what the experts say, we only care about seeing results.
...but with the old timers, we have no problem judging a guy purely on newspaper clippings. "BENNY LEONARD DAZZLES IN IMPRESSIVE UNANIMOUS DECISION WIN" - Nice! I bet he'd whip Sweetpea's ass!
People also seem to assume more fights = better fighter, which is idiotic. In 200 of SRR's fights, how many of those were against actual tough competiton? I would bet the number is extremely low. How much can you really learn beating up a stiff in some smokey banquet hall? Floyd could fight a bum every 2 weeks and run his record up to 200-0 if he wanted to. Would people be impressed?
Array
Where was part 1 - the heavyweights? you lost that and now you start this which is even more stupid.
SRR would batter the living shit out of Floyd as would Hearns and Leonard. Get over yourself.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
This thread supports the observation that all glory of men will be passing away sooner or later
No matter how good, famous, rich, etc you were, someday it all will de doubted and then forgotten
Learn Mike Tyson style and elements of Peekaboo @ SugarBoxing
And who would pay Floyd to see that shit?
For all this talk about how fighting was their trade back then, they had to box to make a dollar etc.- well that is all true, I never said these guys weren't tough and I never said these guys didn't have it tougher in their day.. But today, with ever present media and the ridiculous standard that fighters are held to, fans underestimate the enormous pressure that the boxers are under to perform.
If a boxers chooses to face a fighter that is even somewhat considered a bum or a mismatch the media is on it, the forums are on it, they are openly and constantly ridiculed at every step. If they suffer even 1 loss, struggle or minor upset their whole career may be called into question. The past warriors did not have to contend with this.
@NVSemininteresting read, though I would ask for images or animated gifs to back it up
I could help you with that, I mean making gifs and such , if you'd be interested in blogging at my website
I might beCould I take a look at your website mate??
@greynotsoold
I was a child of the 80's and a teenager in the 90's and so it's true I have no special connection to the golden age fighters. I have boxed Amatuer most of my life and am a qualified fitness instructor. I am a big fan and have watched endless fights and enjoy analysis.
As for your statement, thinking SRR would force Mayweather to fight and hence be stopped, that has been the idea for most all of Mayweathers opponents. These opponents look fantastic against their other opponents and whilst training for the Mayweather fight. Mayweather bummifies his opponents. I think, and this is just my observations here so only my opinion, that SRR would find mostly air, become frustrated... And punch more and more air. But I could just be crazy...
Sorry I haven't the inclination to find a nice clip of May punching his opponents like the other bloke posted but there is many![]()
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
Array
Fair enough...I don't think that Robinson would be 'bummified' (and that is a good word and I will someday use it and claim to have invented it) by anything that Mayweather could throw at him. If you watch Robinson, he has, first of all,a significant height and reach advantage over Mayweather. Second, he throws a right hand to the body that would work well against Mayweather.
He would not let Floyd control the tempo and the pacing of the fight. That is the how/why of making mayweather fight. See, in between the easy, pay day fights, while he was padding his record, Robinson fought Mandell and Angot and Zivic and Jackie Wilson and artie levine and Tommy Bell. He fought a lot of very good fighters.
Canelo? he fought...? Of course he didn't know how to fight Floyd.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks