Nobody will ever change my mind on this, Matthew Macklin is an average at best fighter. Barker would have boxed his head off. I think Murray is likely the best of them but the reason Macklin always loses when he steps up is because he aint that good. He woukd have lost to Geale if he'd got the shot. Barker's desire to win it won him the world title. I think as soon as he achieved that it was time to retire. And technically, GGG aint the middleweight champion until he beats Sergio Martinez.
Barker, Murray and Mack have all lost everytime they been in at top level. Dont see how singling out Mack for this supports your argument. Barker is so fragile which is why he loses to Mack and Murray. They both break him down eventually. Both have ore pop then Sturm and Geale in my opinion and they were able to seriously hurt Barker.
Barker stepped up and won a world title when it counted.
Murray was robbed in both his title fights for me.
Macklin has lost 3 times and has never won a really meaningful fight. Yet he talks how he is a level above. He grinds my gears, and you probably poked the bear. I really can't stand the cunt.
GGG tears all a new asshole.
At least he can be comfortably off now, he don't strike me as the type to spunk it all away.
Doubt we'll see him again and he must be gutted.
He won that title through pure graft, I like Barker but he never struck me as a naturally gifted fighter more a Gary Neville type![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks