A look at Robinson and Mayweather- Modern vs Old timers part 2!

[Max Power]

Technically rocco... you are correct! If your boxing analysis was as good as your screening of my quips you might see things more my way!!

[ruthless rocco]

Technically rocco... you are correct! If your boxing analysis was as good as your screening of my quips you might see things more my way!!

After having "screened" the majority of your posts I've noticed that around 95% of the forum members responding to your ridiculous posts disagree with your very opinionated but deeply flawed boxing analysis.

You have alot of opinions but no knowledge to back those opinions up. when someone disagrees with you your primary response is "you're brainwashed"

In one of the threads that you started you admit that you don't know if draping oneself over an opponent and wrestling them is illegal! WTF guy...think a little and stop looking for attention all the time.

[bradlee180]

max power, you don't know a left hook from a fish hook, an uppercut from a coldcut, a straight right from a right cross....

[Max Power]

Well Mr. Rocco, if it was so clear cut then how come you were unable to provide anything like a conclusive answer either yes/no or why it's tolerated. I specifically asked to be replied to by someone with fine knowledge of the rules, not some arbitrary forum basher and preferably one not one eyed biased against the fighter in question.

Instead I get more non-sensical input for you and your alt Bradley. Here's a thought, if you don't like the content of a thread, IGNORE it! You could ignore me altogether if you wanted but you find some amusement poking sticks since your favourites got exposed as less than super-human and your a little butt-hurt. Get over it you little child!

[ruthless rocco]

Well Mr. Rocco, if it was so clear cut then how come you were unable to provide anything like a conclusive answer either yes/no or why it's tolerated. I specifically asked to be replied to by someone with fine knowledge of the rules, not some arbitrary forum basher and preferably one not one eyed biased against the fighter in question.

Instead I get more non-sensical input for you and your alt Bradley. Here's a thought, if you don't like the content of a thread, IGNORE it! You could ignore me altogether if you wanted but you find some amusement poking sticks since your favourites got exposed as less than super-human and your a little butt-hurt. Get over it you little child!

You're not your...unless you're talking about your sore asshole.

[Max Power]

Is the occasional spelling mistake really important to you on a boxing forum? That's just sad!

I bring analysis, you bring a spell checker.

Well done. That's pretty good for you!

[ruthless rocco]

Is the occasional spelling mistake really important to you on a boxing forum? That's just sad!

I bring analysis, you bring a spell checker.

Well done. That's pretty good for you!

It's not a spelling mistake, it's a grammatical error.

My point is that you don't know what you're talking about.
-Not when you're falsely attributing quotes to me(which you've done twice).
-Not when you're trying to be clever --making comments about heavy metal poisoning.
-Not when you're giving me english lessons.
-Not when you're trying to argue about boxing-- It's rules or it's history, not to mention it's future.

Why didn't I answer you when you were asking whether it was legal for fighters wrestle each other? Because you know the answer or you're a moron. Your posts are always the same in so much as you always have your own preformed answer to your question that you think is special and unique and that you're hoping you can stir shit up by telling those who respond that they're wrong and have been brainwashed to believe "old American centered ideas".