Quote Originally Posted by nuggetdotcom View Post
What Brit is going to pay for a PPV with Froch in it that doesn't include Groves?

He's been a great fighter, with some classic performances, but his shenanigens after the Groves fix have bolloxed it for his market value.

He needs to show some humility after what was arguably a defeat by Groves, and attempt to set the record straight, difficult as we all know because Groves has his number. But that's boxing! Ken Norton and Leon Spinks spring to mind.
Me...because I'm a boxing junkie and I get fed up when watching a stream and it gets taken down.

The longer this goes on, the more I see the Groves rematch happening and all this "will he, won't he" crap is part of the big sell that Froch didn't need it but he's giving the fans what they want. I'm about 95% sure they'll fight again this year. Too much money involved to not. Froch has a legacy and not fighting Groves would ruin that and the money this PPV would generate all goes in a big, fat retirement pot.

Some people think Hearn is a slimy bastard, but right now I'm loving Matchroom because they're giving us competative fight cards from top to bottom, something Warren & Maloney stopped doing years ago, and something Hennessy has never, ever done.