Re: Carl Frampton vs. Hugo Cazares on April 4th in Belfast as WBC Final Elimanator

Originally Posted by
bzkfn

Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Cazares is being underestimated here.. he's always been one of those fighters whose half step shy of being an elite but good enough to compete with the best.. if I remember correct, he got robbed in Puerto Rico against a prime Calderon and the rematch got stopped prematurely. I know that was years ago but he's only lost one close fight to shimizu and have been on a winning streak since then..
Cazares is a switch hitter and he's capable of giving frampton some new looks.. he may not have carried his power up to the higher weights but the guy has a lot of experience. I actually think he's frampton's toughest opponent to date.
I also disagree with what people are saying about it being a nothing fight, he's fighting a final elimanator for a title. I would assume he turned down the Quigg fight as my guess is that Hearn hit him with a low ball offer and he's actually making more money to fight Cazares in Belfast. It's funny, 9 months ago when he beat Martinez Hearn told us that Frampton was the A-Side and Quigg had to realise that. Then Frampton goes his own way and Quigg signs with Hearn and now Quigg is the A-Side with a World Title to his name. What a difference a year makes.
He will make more against Cazares in front of 7000 people in Belfast, on BoxNation, than against Quigg in front of 20,000 in Manchester on Sky Sports? You kidding?
Look, I am just making a point to the "Quigg is ducking Frampton" brigade that when he was offered the fight - incidentally the purse was apparently 3X his biggest payday - he turned it down. Why? The clue is in the TV station, City and promoter. It's just boxing politics.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks