I remember reading this on another forum a year ago. Was that you posting under a different name? If not, you should have the common decency to source something if you're just going to copy and paste.
Anyway, the case is far from closed, at least for me.
As I understand it, nobody ever claimed he had Plaster of Paris in his glove. Supposedly it was a substance SIMILIAR to plaster of paris that hardened when exposed to oxygen. I'm FAR from a chemistry expert so what the physical difference is between the two substances, I don't know. But according to the guys who did the test, it wasn't plaster of paris but it did have the ability to harden.
As far as actual PoP goes, I don't think ONE experiment completely dispels it's potential usefulness in the loading of a glove. The experiment would have been done with numerous assumptions dictating the conditions of the experiment (i.e: the placement of the plaster, the amount of plaster used, ect). It's very conceivable that adding of PoP has to be done a certain way (placement, amount, ect) in order to be effective and not encounter the undesirable effects listed in the experiment - a way that is known to those who choose to utilize that kind of thing. This is just speculation on my part, but I do know that ONE FAILED EXPERIMENT DOES NOT PROVE IMPOSSIBILITY. The conditions might just need to be changed.
Then Capetillo began taping Margarito’s left hand, and Richardson asked if he could physically inspect the knuckle pad. Lohuis instructed Capetillo to pass the pad to Richardson. Naazim felt it and said that it seemed unusually hard. He then handed the pad to Lohuis, who agreed that it felt stiffer than is normally the case.
CSAC inspector David Pereda, who was in the room, later testified, “Naazim opened the gauze and pulled something out of it. He showed us what appeared to be an old gauze which had been used before and hardened from perhaps being sweaty and wet many times.”
Inspector Guevara testified, “It [the knuckle pad] was a clean new bandage. But within it, in the inner layers of it, was another bandage wrap. It was not as white as a new bandage wrap would be. It was used and it looked almost like it was sweat soaked and that’s what caused it to have the discoloration. It was harder in certain areas than it should be for pure gauze. It was definitely firm and hard. I believe there was a little bit of, it looked like old blood, on it.”
Mike Bray (an inspector who entered the dressing room during the dispute) recalled, “I observed what appeared to be a blood stain on the corner of the pad. I also noticed that it was moist and dirty-looking. The pad had the appearance that it had been used before. After looking at the pad closer, I could see a white substance smeared across the face of the pad and into the gauze. I touched the white substance, and it was hard to touch. It looked like a cast plaster or maybe a thicker type of white out that you would put on paper.”
By the way, it's very misleading to say they wouldn't allow a 2nd independant examination. No, they wouldn't allow Margarito's lawyer to use his own "expert" to analyze the inserts. That's not an independant examination: the "expert" would have been paid by Margarito. Why would they allow that? The commission is an independant, unbiased organization run by the federal government. What motive would they have had to fake a test against Margarito?
Margarito's trainer testified that he mistakenly put the illegal gauze wrap on Marg's hands because he grabbed the wrong one out of his bag. So the question isn't whether or not Marg's gloves were loaded: THEY WERE.
The only question is whether or not Margarito knew.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote



Bookmarks