What's the difference between Pep and those coddled guys? The only difference is sheer volume: Pep fought more bums, more often. What does that count for? Would you think more of Mayweather if he fought 4 overmatched bums a month instead of two big fights a year?
And you think Floyd vs Pep at 130 would be boring? It would be a massacre. Floyd was a boxer-puncher at 130 with a very high KO %. People seem to forget that and assume he always fought the way he does now.
Pep would be fighting a guy who's bigger, stronger, faster, more skilled, hits harder, and has the longer reach. He'd be lucky to make it to round 8.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks