ive heard old timers talking about Willy Pep beating Floyd Mayweather

[Beanflicker]

Vs all the coddled guys that have winning records today because of spoon fed opponents and only fight once or twice a year.

Anyway if I couldn't sleep I'd imagine what the rounds would look like in this fight rather then count sheep.

What's the difference between Pep and those coddled guys? The only difference is sheer volume: Pep fought more bums, more often. What does that count for? Would you think more of Mayweather if he fought 4 overmatched bums a month instead of two big fights a year?

And you think Floyd vs Pep at 130 would be boring? It would be a massacre. Floyd was a boxer-puncher at 130 with a very high KO %. People seem to forget that and assume he always fought the way he does now.

Pep would be fighting a guy who's bigger, stronger, faster, more skilled, hits harder, and has the longer reach. He'd be lucky to make it to round 8.