Sam Peter was more dangerous than Frazier? I don't even know where to begin with that. I just question your mental capacity.
Joe Frazier's career at a glance..
Frazier was blind on left eye his entire professional career (after a training accident 1964). He would pass medical exams by covering his left eye and then switch his arm to cover his left eye AGAIN. Such a handicap as Frazier wouldn't be allowed to box nowadays.
Height: 5'11'.5" (BOTTOM-2 of Wladimir Klitschko's opponents)
Started as a cruiser 197 lbs. Median weight 204 lbs. Peter NOT ONCE fought anyone as light as that.
Median weight of Frazier's KO'victim: 197 lbs (cruiser)
Career record (all fights): 32-4 (not too impressive)
Career record real heavyweight fights 200×2 lbs: 13-4 (bum)
Frazier never fought an opponent a hefty as Wlad's AVERAGE opponent.
That would be Frazier's real experience compared to Samuel Peter. Every opponent Samuel Peter faced with such little experience he KO'd within early rounds.
Frazier ducked/never fought some of the better+hard punching boxers of his time like Sonny Liston, Mac Foster, Earnie Shavers, Ken Norton, Cleveland Williams. Peter fought both Klitschko's and other of the most hard punching division of all time.
The only time Frazier met a guy of comparable quality to a modern boxer he got brutally annihilated 2ce.

Yeah I think I can safely say that Samuel Peter is just a little bit more dangerous than Frazier.

A seemingly harsh but highly accurate desciption of Frazier would be an out of shape, chinny, featherfisted, handicapped punch bag bum dwarf with a very limited style.

The ONLY reason that Frazier is pumped up to be anything other today is because the OTNB community KNOWS that if it admits Frazier is no match for a modern boxer, then it is virtually conceding that Ali and the rest of the Golden Age is of lesser calibre as well. That's why the fantasy of Frazier must be upheld because he is a pillar for the whole charade because he beat the greatest!