Sergey Kovalev vs. Cedric Agnew

[Spicoli]

Given the opponent and situation, Kovalev really could only be seen in the negative? No? I thought he dominated the fight after a feel out 1st followed by Agnew climbing into a defensive cage and hoping he punched himself out. His jab was varied, when the guard was solid upstairs he opened to body. He smashed a overmatched but ballsy defensive minded foe.

Yeah I suppose that's true in a sense. He showed some kinks in that indestructible tag he seems to carry around though. Its hard not to dominate with a guy like that but I just found his performance a little flat.

I know what you're saying, Kovalev did what we expected but not in his usuall borderline spectular fashion.
It could be because Agnew has been training hard for a defensive fight.

We don't always need a Wilder walking through no names with defenses made of wet bread He showed adjustment and adaptability to a strong defense..and got 1,2 rounds more then usual. I just can't see a thing to rake him on.

[IamInuit]

Damn. All I said is that he looked a little flat and seemed human. How that is being overly critical is puzzling to say the least.

[armin]

Damn. All I said is that he looked a little flat and seemed human. How that is being overly critical is puzzling to say the least.

I meant in the sense that when the worst thing we can say about a dude is he looked flat while winning every round handily still then were sort of just looking to critique in some way. Nothing against you or your comment iaminuit you're one of my favorite posters on here

[mrbig1]

I'm still a wait and see guy. I want to see more of him.