Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Are PPVs ruining boxing?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are PPVs ruining boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    2014 already has more PPVs lined up than almost any previous year. Between January and July, there are 6 ppvs. That's a PPV per month.

    Canelo vs. Angulo
    Pacquiao vs. Bradley II
    Mayweather vs. Maidana
    Martinez vs. Cotto
    Canelo vs. Lara
    Junior vs. GGG

    It's unfortunate because (1) it limits growth and (2) it requires boxing fans to pay a large amount of money to watch fights. To grow, boxing needs to appeal to as large a section of society as it can. The audience for a PPV is limited. Imagine how many people would watch Floyd if he fought on a regular network for one of his fights. Consider that HBO has 1.1 million people tune in for a Kovalev fight and HBO is a subscription based network.

    At $70 per HD PPV event, if you bought every one of the above fights, that's $420 in addition to the cable subscription fees of $10-$15 per month per channel. Annually, before you include the prices of tickets for boxing events, it comes out to around $500. A basketball or soccer fan pays nothing to be fan. And they wonder why boxing is a niche sport?
    Fighters make more money on PPV. After everything was added up Saul Alvarez took home around 5 to 6 million for the Angulo fight. If that fight wasn't on PPV he would of only took home 1.3 million. It makes sense to put it on PPV. As long as fights turn a profit they'll be on PPV

    Obviously I would rather have the fights on regular HBO/ShowTime. But that's not the case. Not everything is free. I'm not gonna not watch the fights. So I'll just pay for all of them and watch them. Really it's not even all that much.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,200
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1880
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are PPVs ruining boxing?

    Yes

    My interest has waned over last 3-4 years as I now don't pay for ppv fights or even see them if its on one of the subscription channels.

    On saying that I am going to pay for Froch Groves II.

    And I'm a fight fan - how is the casual fan ever going to come on board ?
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are PPVs ruining boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark TKO View Post
    Yes

    My interest has waned over last 3-4 years as I now don't pay for ppv fights or even see them if its on one of the subscription channels.

    On saying that I am going to pay for Froch Groves II.

    And I'm a fight fan - how is the casual fan ever going to come on board ?
    That's there problem.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1321
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are PPVs ruining boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    2014 already has more PPVs lined up than almost any previous year. Between January and July, there are 6 ppvs. That's a PPV per month.

    Canelo vs. Angulo
    Pacquiao vs. Bradley II
    Mayweather vs. Maidana
    Martinez vs. Cotto
    Canelo vs. Lara
    Junior vs. GGG

    It's unfortunate because (1) it limits growth and (2) it requires boxing fans to pay a large amount of money to watch fights. To grow, boxing needs to appeal to as large a section of society as it can. The audience for a PPV is limited. Imagine how many people would watch Floyd if he fought on a regular network for one of his fights. Consider that HBO has 1.1 million people tune in for a Kovalev fight and HBO is a subscription based network.

    At $70 per HD PPV event, if you bought every one of the above fights, that's $420 in addition to the cable subscription fees of $10-$15 per month per channel. Annually, before you include the prices of tickets for boxing events, it comes out to around $500. A basketball or soccer fan pays nothing to be fan. And they wonder why boxing is a niche sport?
    Fighters make more money on PPV. After everything was added up Saul Alvarez took home around 5 to 6 million for the Angulo fight. If that fight wasn't on PPV he would of only took home 1.3 million. It makes sense to put it on PPV. As long as fights turn a profit they'll be on PPV

    Obviously I would rather have the fights on regular HBO/ShowTime. But that's not the case. Not everything is free. I'm not gonna not watch the fights. So I'll just pay for all of them and watch them. Really it's not even all that much.
    No doubt it it is good for the fighters.

    But, think about it. If you are a soccer or baseball fan you can watch games for free all the time, even the biggest games of the season. Occasionally, you shell out for tickets to a game. If you are a boxing fan, you're dropping over $500 just to watch events without including the cost of tickets for matches. How can the sport grow if it costs so much money to be a fan?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are PPVs ruining boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    2014 already has more PPVs lined up than almost any previous year. Between January and July, there are 6 ppvs. That's a PPV per month.

    Canelo vs. Angulo
    Pacquiao vs. Bradley II
    Mayweather vs. Maidana
    Martinez vs. Cotto
    Canelo vs. Lara
    Junior vs. GGG

    It's unfortunate because (1) it limits growth and (2) it requires boxing fans to pay a large amount of money to watch fights. To grow, boxing needs to appeal to as large a section of society as it can. The audience for a PPV is limited. Imagine how many people would watch Floyd if he fought on a regular network for one of his fights. Consider that HBO has 1.1 million people tune in for a Kovalev fight and HBO is a subscription based network.

    At $70 per HD PPV event, if you bought every one of the above fights, that's $420 in addition to the cable subscription fees of $10-$15 per month per channel. Annually, before you include the prices of tickets for boxing events, it comes out to around $500. A basketball or soccer fan pays nothing to be fan. And they wonder why boxing is a niche sport?
    Fighters make more money on PPV. After everything was added up Saul Alvarez took home around 5 to 6 million for the Angulo fight. If that fight wasn't on PPV he would of only took home 1.3 million. It makes sense to put it on PPV. As long as fights turn a profit they'll be on PPV

    Obviously I would rather have the fights on regular HBO/ShowTime. But that's not the case. Not everything is free. I'm not gonna not watch the fights. So I'll just pay for all of them and watch them. Really it's not even all that much.
    No doubt it it is good for the fighters.

    But, think about it. If you are a soccer or baseball fan you can watch games for free all the time, even the biggest games of the season. Occasionally, you shell out for tickets to a game. If you are a boxing fan, you're dropping over $500 just to watch events without including the cost of tickets for matches. How can the sport grow if it costs so much money to be a fan?
    The sport grows at it's own pace. Always has. It'll never been as high as them other sports. But it will always be around. Boxing is immortal. It will never die

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2004
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are PPVs ruining boxing?

    The networks and promoters (and fighters) aren't after growing boxing, they're after making money. If there were ten boxers who could carry a PPV there'd be twenty to thirty PPVs a year.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is Bob Arum ruining boxing?
    By Beanz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-04-2012, 12:39 AM
  2. Is Mayweather ruining the sport of boxing?
    By JonnyFolds in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 01-23-2010, 03:11 AM
  3. Are Judges ruining boxing.......
    By leftylee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-23-2007, 10:36 PM
  4. Is money ruining boxing?
    By Dizaster in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-23-2007, 08:38 AM
  5. Are the new type of Gloves ruining Boxing....?
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-01-2006, 09:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing