Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
... he is not going to want to fight GGG, but certainly can entertain the idea of fighting at MW- if only to duck Manny.
Tell me whch performance makes Golovkin so special?

It certainly wasnt his last.
Macklin, Ishida, Proksa were all flawless performances!
What amazing names.....

This is my point.

Yet in his last fight he looked shit and who was that against?

Maybe hes over the hill now.
Mayweather looked shit in his last fight. Fury has looked shit in all his fights. I don't understand how winning a fight extremely comfortably makes you shit? Ur standards are very strange Ross. Plus Macklin is a good middleweight, Ishida is a tough fighter and Golovkin did what no one else could, the same against Stevens. You can argue all you want about his resume but he is by far the best middleweight at the moment. His resume is as good as the average fighters you worship. Bika is a prime example. I like Bika, he's tough, but he's lost every time he's stepped up.
Bika! 2 of his losses came to 2 of the very best fighters ever in recent years. He put Ward on queer street in the last couple of rounds, something no one else has managed. Froch loses to Bika.

Mayweather didn't look shit. Unless you mean taking no clean shots is looking shit?

Also, bear in mimd that Maidana was a world champ. What was Golovkins last opponent?.......
His last fight was against Osumanu Adama; a stay busy fight in which he destroyed Odama, mentally and physically over 8 rounds. He outclassed a C class fighter which was expected; Guillermo Rigondeaux is guilty of the same thing because he can't find a willing formidable opponent to keep him active. Would you call him past it?