Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    780
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I must be an unusual fan, the rankings are interesting and when I see them I always check them out, but I've never bought a magazine or even walked 20' to check them.
    Interesting but I can do without them.

    Are they something you have to see regularly?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,171
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1870
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    I bought the magazine for over 20 years and always went by them - when I first got into boxing I couldn't understand why the WBA would rank someone 3rd who wasn't even in the top ten for say the IBF. Or why another alphabet champ wasn't even recognised at all by another.

    The Ring rankings made sense and as far as I'm concerned, though I ddon't follow boxing like I did, they are still the ones to go by

    I thought Oscar had pledged to stay out of what went into the magazine especially the rankings ?
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,805
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    No. The RING is compromised.

    “If you want loyalty, buy a dog.” Ricky Hatton





  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    The Ring rankings are now compromised. Broner was top 5 p4p was a joke. Also some champions were lineal, meaning they did beat the man, but was not accorded such status as champion of the division. Then somehow a fighter becomes lineal champ of that division, when the no. 1 and no. 2 of the division never fought.

    Although they may not be as bad as the alphabet soup gangs, they are imo getting there.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    683
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    616
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    No. Mine are

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lineal View Post
    No. Mine are
    I was going to say yours. So you would not accept $10,000 to bump up a fighter from a promoter?
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    683
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    616
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lineal View Post
    No. Mine are
    I was going to say yours. So you would not accept $10,000 to bump up a fighter from a promoter?
    That would ruin all the work I put in. You get a reputation, people talk and the stigma never goes away.

    I could be persuaded with a Mayweather ring walk beside Bieber though

  8. #8
    Addicted to_boxing Guest

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    Not only is Ring no longer a gold standard neither is boxing as whole. HBO PPV initially changed boxing thanks to Pacquiao and Mayweathers cherry picking ways fighting who they want (that will generate the most money) not who they should . Arum is king having taking catchweight to a new level and gaining titles the unconventional way . GBP leader ODLH's willingness to fight Pac at an unrealistic weight for "Money" was the launching pad for this new Arum Tactic.
    Last edited by Addicted to_boxing; 06-17-2014 at 04:29 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    3,795
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    Ring Magazine

    Was good as any Ratings list for awhile.

    They did include other good information;
    * Prospect of the Month
    * Upset of the Month
    * NABF
    * USBA
    * British-Commonwealth
    * European
    * Mexican
    * South American
    * Oriental and Pacific
    * Top Amateur events

    They were 'on-and-off' with the WBC and WBA ratings.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    689
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    For east coasters: NY- Do they still have newstands there?

    Downtown Milwaukee--years & years ago, there was a guy who had a newstand where all the magazines could be bought.

    I remember as a kid racing downtown to buy the latest issue of Ring & a magazine called Right On, with all the latest Funk & R&B entertainers.

    The guy would always make sure I didnt get to look at the top rack, where Playboys were at.

    Though I was only interested in Chunky Asses magazine.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    3,795
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
    For east coasters: NY- Do they still have newstands there?

    Downtown Milwaukee--years & years ago, there was a guy who had a newstand where all the magazines could be bought.

    I remember as a kid racing downtown to buy the latest issue of Ring & a magazine called Right On, with all the latest Funk & R&B entertainers.

    The guy would always make sure I didnt get to look at the top rack, where Playboys were at.

    Though I was only interested in Chunky Asses magazine.

    Remember Boxing Weekly, a weekly newsletter.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,003
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are Ring rankings still the gold standard?

    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post
    I must be an unusual fan, the rankings are interesting and when I see them I always check them out, but I've never bought a magazine or even walked 20' to check them.
    Interesting but I can do without them.

    Are they something you have to see regularly?
    I guess it makes sense to look at it if you wanna see rankings that are different from everyone else's.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. The Ring P4P Rankings
    By oakleyno1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-17-2012, 05:08 PM
  2. Ring rankings are a bit retarded.
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-11-2011, 06:09 AM
  3. New Ring Magazine Rankings
    By C-Lo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-04-2008, 06:23 PM
  4. The New Ring Heavyweight Rankings Our Out
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-12-2007, 11:33 PM
  5. New Square-ring rankings
    By cityboy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-05-2006, 06:52 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing