Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,216
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5142
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    I think the alphabet boy syndicates are slowly coming to the realization that they are on borrowed time and are largely viewed as irrelevant. We really don't "need" some tournament charade for the fans to tell us who is actually "the man" to beat in at least half the divisions as it is. I can't see any substantive move as far as the standardizations put forth without State commissions and boards conducting themselves in the same way. This is just letting the clowns run the operations of the circus. Hell, we have a couple States who have to actually 'borrow' commissions right now. The absolute first thing they need to do is encourage and abide by a unified champion and not roadblock it with obscure manufactured mandatories simply to collect sanctioning fees.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1014
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    I think the alphabet boy syndicates are slowly coming to the realization that they are on borrowed time and are largely viewed as irrelevant. We really don't "need" some tournament charade for the fans to tell us who is actually "the man" to beat in at least half the divisions as it is. I can't see any substantive move as far as the standardizations put forth without State commissions and boards conducting themselves in the same way. This is just letting the clowns run the operations of the circus. Hell, we have a couple States who have to actually 'borrow' commissions right now. The absolute first thing they need to do is encourage and abide by a unified champion and not roadblock it with obscure manufactured mandatories simply to collect sanctioning fees.
    Salient points my friend. And if by chance they do sort something out, the youngin WBO will become a paper weight.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1014
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    I find it odd that my friends at the summit did not discuss the elimination of aluminum, copper, silver, interim, recess & emeritus titles.
    LOL

    Paco Valcarcel- WBO PRES.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,216
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5142
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBA,WBC,IBF agree

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    I think the alphabet boy syndicates are slowly coming to the realization that they are on borrowed time and are largely viewed as irrelevant. We really don't "need" some tournament charade for the fans to tell us who is actually "the man" to beat in at least half the divisions as it is. I can't see any substantive move as far as the standardizations put forth without State commissions and boards conducting themselves in the same way. This is just letting the clowns run the operations of the circus. Hell, we have a couple States who have to actually 'borrow' commissions right now. The absolute first thing they need to do is encourage and abide by a unified champion and not roadblock it with obscure manufactured mandatories simply to collect sanctioning fees.
    Salient points my friend. And if by chance they do sort something out, the youngin WBO will become a paper weight.
    I think they've collectively been in the running for "Supe Cubic Zirconia Paper Bag Champion" for years

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who do you agree with GB or TR?
    By DannyV297 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-06-2014, 09:06 PM
  2. Can we agree....
    By Pugilistic in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 01:28 PM
  3. Do you agree with this statements?
    By XaduBoxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 10-01-2008, 09:58 AM
  4. Experts Agree...
    By Deanrw in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-07-2008, 09:56 PM
  5. can we all agree?
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-29-2007, 01:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing