Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
are you directed this at me specifically or just in general? i hold all fighters to the same standards. i am not the one who said that floyd or broner had to move up weight to prove themselves. i didnt even say that ggg couldnt. im just saying that crawford is growing out of his weight class and that the next weight class up is where big money fights are. again, if ggg were growing out of his weight class too i would say the same thing. and as maravilla said, ggg was supposed to fight chavez at 168 but the fight fell through.
There is nothing at 160 for GG since Sergio was executed.

He'd be HEAVILLY favored over anybody in that dead excuse for a weight division...in other words THERE ARE NO CHALLENGES FOR HIM at 160.

Seems like he should be "challenging himself" and "taking risks".

GG was quick to move to 168 for Jr but told Ward he had too much business to take of at 160.

It was a bitch move that he should have been called out for.