Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Terrance Crawford...next?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    750
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
    Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

    GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

    No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

    Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

    Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
    Why? Broners a piece of shit. I hold virtually everyone in the world to a higher standard then him

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    535
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    615
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
    Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

    GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

    No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

    Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

    Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
    Why? Broners a piece of shit. I hold virtually everyone in the world to a higher standard then him
    For all we know you're a piece of shit.

    At least Broner isn't a 32 year old coward hiding in a dead weight division.

    "I'll fight anybody from 154 to 168"

    Soon as Ward responded....nothing but crickets.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    750
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
    Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

    GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

    No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

    Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

    Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
    Why? Broners a piece of shit. I hold virtually everyone in the world to a higher standard then him
    For all we know you're a piece of shit.

    At least Broner isn't a 32 year old coward hiding in a dead weight division.

    "I'll fight anybody from 154 to 168"

    Soon as Ward responded....nothing but crickets.
    No hes a 24 year punk wannabe gangster who takes easy fights and looks shit. And just because you put quotation marks around a phrase doesnt make it a quote you absolute cretin, show me a video of Golovkin saying hell fight anyone?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    535
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    615
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
    Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

    GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

    No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

    Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

    Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
    Why? Broners a piece of shit. I hold virtually everyone in the world to a higher standard then him
    For all we know you're a piece of shit.

    At least Broner isn't a 32 year old coward hiding in a dead weight division.

    "I'll fight anybody from 154 to 168"

    Soon as Ward responded....nothing but crickets.
    No hes a 24 year punk wannabe gangster who takes easy fights and looks shit. And just because you put quotation marks around a phrase doesnt make it a quote you absolute cretin, show me a video of Golovkin saying hell fight anyone?
    Taking easy fights sums up GG's entire career.
    Broner started at 130 and jumped all the way to WW in a matter of months...if only GG had those balls.
    GG's handlers said he'd fight anybody from 154 to 168.

    Now show me where Golovkin disagreed with his handlers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    654
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    Back on topic Beltran has to be the obvious choice or possibly Diaz considering their association with Top Rank
    Cold Heart and a Weak Mind

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    619
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    749
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by La Cucaracha View Post
    Back on topic Beltran has to be the obvious choice or possibly Diaz considering their association with Top Rank
    Well Crawford had trouble making weight. He said before the fight that he'd move up afterwards and he said he'd leave it to the managers which if I were he's manager id move him up to 140 to where the big money is. He could beat Peterson, a fight with DeMarco would be okay, Broner , Garcia. And if Pac if really going to 140 thatd be a fight to look for later on.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    654
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    Quote Originally Posted by Maravilla2012 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by La Cucaracha View Post
    Back on topic Beltran has to be the obvious choice or possibly Diaz considering their association with Top Rank
    Well Crawford had trouble making weight. He said before the fight that he'd move up afterwards and he said he'd leave it to the managers which if I were he's manager id move him up to 140 to where the big money is. He could beat Peterson, a fight with DeMarco would be okay, Broner , Garcia. And if Pac if really going to 140 thatd be a fight to look for later on.
    I'd like to see Crawford fight at least once more at 135 but if he is struggling to make weight then a move up would be sensible but if he can build his following against Beltran and Diaz then the money for bigger fights at 140 increases
    Cold Heart and a Weak Mind

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1439
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
    Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

    GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

    No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

    Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

    Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
    Why? Broners a piece of shit. I hold virtually everyone in the world to a higher standard then him
    For all we know you're a piece of shit.

    At least Broner isn't a 32 year old coward hiding in a dead weight division.

    "I'll fight anybody from 154 to 168"

    Soon as Ward responded....nothing but crickets.
    No hes a 24 year punk wannabe gangster who takes easy fights and looks shit. And just because you put quotation marks around a phrase doesnt make it a quote you absolute cretin, show me a video of Golovkin saying hell fight anyone?
    LOL He is an absolute cretin.

    Just ignore this guy. He can't even admit when he's wrong n is an antagonistic poster in dire need of male attention.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Crawford v Gamboa June 29
    By IamInuit in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 07-01-2014, 12:33 PM
  2. Crawford-Beltran is next
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-16-2014, 08:10 AM
  3. Mr Crawford
    By Dia bando in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-05-2014, 09:56 AM
  4. WBO orders Burns-Crawford
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-19-2013, 07:30 AM
  5. Terrance Crawford vs. Adrien Broner
    By Hulk in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-09-2013, 07:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing