Amir Khan arrested for assault

[Gandalf]

I would like to know more details before attacking him. The UK is a very easy place to get arrested in and I imagine Khan gets a lot of abuse. However, if I was in his position I wouldn't allow myself to be put into an uncompromising public situation with anyone. We need to know more about it before blaming anyone completely.

hahahaha

Look who wants more details before attacking like a bitch....lol.

If that were Mayweather or Broner you'd be talking shit already....but since it's one of your muslim immigrant brethren...you withhold your girlish attacks.

Interesting. I had no idea that I was pro immigration or Muslim, but I do know that you are an idiot and should be punched very hard in the groin. Now get out of my way, peasant.

[Gandalf]

Amir Khan assault allegations withdrawn - Crime - UK - The Independent

This is why I was reticent in my original posting. I attack corruption and lies without restraint on all topics, but I won't attack for no reason. My original post was on the mark. I expect a handwritten apology and another free shot at the groin area.

[brocktonblockbust]

lil Amir Faggy-Figgy Pudding Khan assaults someone during the Holy Month of Ramadan my my!

[AdamGB]

A supernatural being/diety comes from a belief in whichever religious tale you've bought. As an agnostic you believe the evidence of these thousands of gods is nonsense, right? These tales/beliefs are clearly man-made? But you can never say never...

Athesim doesn't have to prove anything. It's based on learning and common sense. It's not about faith/belief.

Atheism is the beleif that science is infalible and complete enough that you can make a dogmatic conclusion from it.

You've said it yourself: science is always changing, how can it be infalable? Our scope and comprehension of science are nowhere near complete enough and probably never will be.

It's very egocentric to presume that humans have the intellectual capacity to fully understand and explain existence.

Faith in science is still faith.

You're also a little off the mark about what being agnostic is.

[SugarBoxing]

A supernatural being/diety comes from a belief in whichever religious tale you've bought. As an agnostic you believe the evidence of these thousands of gods is nonsense, right? These tales/beliefs are clearly man-made? But you can never say never...

Athesim doesn't have to prove anything. It's based on learning and common sense. It's not about faith/belief.

Atheism is the beleif that science is infalible and complete enough that you can make a dogmatic conclusion from it.

You've said it yourself: science is always changing, how can it be infalable? Our scope and comprehension of science are nowhere near complete enough and probably never will be.

It's very egocentric to presume that humans have the intellectual capacity to fully understand and explain existence.

Faith in science is still faith.

You're also a little off the mark about what being agnostic is.

Faith is good opinion of God. There rest are hopes, dreams, and illusions

[AdamGB]

Webster and Oxford might disagree with you there...

[Fenster]

A supernatural being/diety comes from a belief in whichever religious tale you've bought. As an agnostic you believe the evidence of these thousands of gods is nonsense, right? These tales/beliefs are clearly man-made? But you can never say never...

Athesim doesn't have to prove anything. It's based on learning and common sense. It's not about faith/belief.

Atheism is the beleif that science is infalible and complete enough that you can make a dogmatic conclusion from it.

You've said it yourself: science is always changing, how can it be infalable? Our scope and comprehension of science are nowhere near complete enough and probably never will be.

It's very egocentric to presume that humans have the intellectual capacity to fully understand and explain existence.

Faith in science is still faith.

You're also a little off the mark about what being agnostic is.

Science is infallible? I never realised this was claimed, I thought it was the exact opposite. I thought it was constantly trying to discover how stuff works.

Faith is not required to dismiss supernatural beings from stories.

[AdamGB]

Yes! The very essesence of science is that it is fallable...
To base a dogmatic beleif on something that is fallable requires you to have faith in it.

Not placing belief in a Deity or believing there is a no Deity in existence at all are very different things, one requires FAITH in the scope of Science, the other does not, I'll let you figure out which.

[Fenster]

Yes! The very essesence of science is that it is fallable...
To base a dogmatic beleif on something that is fallable requires you to have faith in it.

Not placing belief in a Deity or believing there is a no Deity in existence at all are very different things, one requires FAITH in the scope of Science, the other does not, I'll let you figure out which.

I'm not sure what you mean by "dogmatic belief?"

Can anyone prove there wasn't a supernatural creator? No.

Does science prove how things work? Yes. That is a fact not faith.

[AdamGB]

Dogma is essentially the opposite of theory... Google?

Science is not dogmatic in nature, stating the total nonexistence of god is

I'm now not even sure you can grasp science in anything more than a vague and oversimplified manner either, let alone how it relates to the concepts we're discussing so I think we're at an impass.

Lets talk about Hamed being overhyped by nostalgic jingoists instead.

[Fenster]

Dogma is essentially the opposite of theory... Google?

Science is not dogmatic in nature, stating the total nonexistence of god is

I'm now not even sure you can grasp science in anything more than a vague and oversimplified manner either, let alone how it relates to the concepts we're discussing so I think we're at an impass.

Lets talk about Hamed being overhyped by nostalgic jingoists instead.

Sorry for being so intellectually inferior to you Adam. I don't have the time to entertain you with Naz at the moment.

But just do me the favour of explaining exactly what I have faith in?

[AdamGB]

I thought I already had... This is why I'm saying we're at an impass.

[Fenster]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

[Master]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

When he says laymans terms he means very basic for thick people.

[Master]

Amir Khan has been notified that any allegations against him following his arrest on suspicion of assault have been dropped.

It was reported on Friday that Khan had been arrested by the Greater Manchester Police on suspicion of assaulting two men in Bolton.

And whilst the Greater Manchester Police released a statement regarding the arrest, 27-year-old Khan took to Twitter in the hope of quashing the speculation.

However, it has since been confirmed that Khan was involved in the incident, but all allegations have now been dropped.

Amir Khan was arrested during the early hours of Friday 4th July on suspicion of common assault against two youths. Shortly thereafter he was released on police bail pending further enquiries.

This was a minor incident involving a misunderstanding between Amir Khan and two other youths.

On Monday 7th July Amir was notified by the police that the allegations against him had been withdrawn and the matter would not be pursued any further.

https://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/...5057--box.html