Amir Khan arrested for assault

[AdamGB]

Yes! The very essesence of science is that it is fallable...
To base a dogmatic beleif on something that is fallable requires you to have faith in it.

Not placing belief in a Deity or believing there is a no Deity in existence at all are very different things, one requires FAITH in the scope of Science, the other does not, I'll let you figure out which.

[Fenster]

Yes! The very essesence of science is that it is fallable...
To base a dogmatic beleif on something that is fallable requires you to have faith in it.

Not placing belief in a Deity or believing there is a no Deity in existence at all are very different things, one requires FAITH in the scope of Science, the other does not, I'll let you figure out which.

I'm not sure what you mean by "dogmatic belief?"

Can anyone prove there wasn't a supernatural creator? No.

Does science prove how things work? Yes. That is a fact not faith.

[AdamGB]

Dogma is essentially the opposite of theory... Google?

Science is not dogmatic in nature, stating the total nonexistence of god is

I'm now not even sure you can grasp science in anything more than a vague and oversimplified manner either, let alone how it relates to the concepts we're discussing so I think we're at an impass.

Lets talk about Hamed being overhyped by nostalgic jingoists instead.

[Fenster]

Dogma is essentially the opposite of theory... Google?

Science is not dogmatic in nature, stating the total nonexistence of god is

I'm now not even sure you can grasp science in anything more than a vague and oversimplified manner either, let alone how it relates to the concepts we're discussing so I think we're at an impass.

Lets talk about Hamed being overhyped by nostalgic jingoists instead.

Sorry for being so intellectually inferior to you Adam. I don't have the time to entertain you with Naz at the moment.

But just do me the favour of explaining exactly what I have faith in?

[AdamGB]

I thought I already had... This is why I'm saying we're at an impass.

[Fenster]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

[Master]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

When he says laymans terms he means very basic for thick people.

[Andre]

Can you put it in layman's terms please? (this is not an argument)

I think he is trying to say that people who say Science is correct in evolution therefore God botherers are incorrect. Are as stupid as those who believe in fairtales.

Im with that because the message behind the fairy tales is different from the actual fairy tale; because people back in those times couldnt have it explained to them any other way than father figure Mother figure tiers of power from the stars down to them and be good for fucks sake etc.

Same as science (nuts and bolts material study) couldnt explain that we are all made from invisible pieces of energy that was all from a Sun that once exploded and now that energy has been compressed down into material in a lower vibrating dimension so that you can feel shit and experience it 'for real materially'. Also that the energy has electrical impulses and how you feel and what you do effects your state physically and those around you because the energy has effects outside of the material it manifests.

Now science couldnt prove that in a fit and neither could religion so they oppose themselves where as the truth is over there not with them although they both have valid points.

Physics on the other hand has proven it and some scientists and strict nuts and bolts thinking evolutionists still dont like it, some agnotics dont like it and some religious who have been told to have faith only dont like it either. Because its all tending to point in a spirit (invisible) direction for the answers behind the energy which is 'materially speaking' frequencies vibrating light and electromagnetic energy into different densities of harmony and dis harmony that has been given some sort of dimensional freedom to evolve as it will.