Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    McAllen, Texas?
    Posts
    5,504
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1215
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    I think Napoles beats him. In my mind Napoles is the second best welter of all time and I think he'd give Robinson all he could handle. Curry, at his peak, was very good and Duran was only a very good welter on one night. I think Duran would beat Cotto more times than not.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1397
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    I remember a few years back I went on a bit of a Carlos Monzon fixation (I do this from time to time with different fighters... I think Ken Norton was the latest one :X ) but anyway, I ended up getting completely aside tracked after seeing the Napoles fight (even thigh he lost) you could see he washe was incredibly talented.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    957
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    I think Napoles beats him. In my mind Napoles is the second best welter of all time and I think he'd give Robinson all he could handle. Curry, at his peak, was very good and Duran was only a very good welter on one night. I think Duran would beat Cotto more times than not.
    One fight I remember at the time, was Duran V Palomino that is one of the best fights I
    have seen, at welterweight, Carlos was no bum he was a excellent fighter.
    Duran V Moore he ripped that title away from Moore, that night a young hunger Champ
    gets schooled , by a washed up DURAN or so people were thinking.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    773
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    I like Cotto and think he is a good, solid fighter. I also think that he has had some great match making to get to the level he is at and the prestige he enjoys. I don't view Cotto at WW anywhere near the level of fighter that Duran was. I hate to say that about Cotto, because he is a solid and likeable guy who works hard and always shows up to fight, but again, he just doesn't have the durability or overall athleticism to compete with Duran.

    Napoles was a great WW, and it would have been fascinating to see if Duran could have solved a smooth boxing stylist like that at WW. Duran had slow feet, even at lightweight, which I think puts him at a disadvantage against fast, mobile boxers like Napoles, Whitaker, Leonard...etc.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    The last time we saw the truly great Roberto Duran was in Leonard 1, he was an outstanding Lightweight, arguably the greatest LW of all time, certainly top 3. As a Welterweight we only have that one fight to judge him by, he was never the same after 'no mas'. Everything post Leonard 1 shows Duran as half the fighter he once was. People forget that by the time Duran fought Leonard he was 71-1 and not quite 30 years old. Think about that for a minute and begin to imagine any of today's fighters having 72 fights before they turn 30!! He was already a well worn veteran, the Leonard fight was the pinnacle for him, there was only one way he could go after that. Fights against Napoles and Cervantes were talked about, and no doubt Duran would've been trouble for both of them. The one fight i would've loved to have seen was Duran V Pryor.
    He wins against Cotto and Curry, Napoles goes either way as he was a great Welterweight champion.
    Whitaker is the one who would drive him crazy....
    Last edited by THE THIRD MAN; 08-09-2014 at 03:32 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    The last time we saw the truly great Roberto Duran was in Leonard 1, he was an outstanding Lightweight, arguably the greatest LW of all time, certainly top 3. As a Welterweight we only have that one fight to judge him by, he was never the same after 'no mas'. Everything post Leonard 1 shows Duran as half the fighter he once was. People forget that by the time Duran fought Leonard he was 71-1 and not quite 30 years old. Think about that for a minute and begin to imagine any of today's fighters having 72 fights before they turn 30!! He was already a well worn veteran, the Leonard fight was the pinnacle for him, there was only one way he could go after that. Fights against Napoles and Cervantes were talked about, and no doubt Duran would've been trouble for both of them. The one fight i would've loved to have seen was Duran V Pryor.
    He wins against Cotto and Curry, Napoles goes either way as he was a great Welterweight champion.
    Whitaker is the one who would drive him crazy....
    He is the only fighter that people will forgive him for quitting agagainst Leonard and still put some great victories well past his bes against Moore and Barclay.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    The last time we saw the truly great Roberto Duran was in Leonard 1, he was an outstanding Lightweight, arguably the greatest LW of all time, certainly top 3. As a Welterweight we only have that one fight to judge him by, he was never the same after 'no mas'. Everything post Leonard 1 shows Duran as half the fighter he once was. People forget that by the time Duran fought Leonard he was 71-1 and not quite 30 years old. Think about that for a minute and begin to imagine any of today's fighters having 72 fights before they turn 30!! He was already a well worn veteran, the Leonard fight was the pinnacle for him, there was only one way he could go after that. Fights against Napoles and Cervantes were talked about, and no doubt Duran would've been trouble for both of them. The one fight i would've loved to have seen was Duran V Pryor.
    He wins against Cotto and Curry, Napoles goes either way as he was a great Welterweight champion.
    Whitaker is the one who would drive him crazy....
    He is the only fighter that people will forgive him for quitting agagainst Leonard and still put some great victories well past his bes against Moore and Barclay.
    'No Mas' is still the strangest thing i have seen in boxing and i can only put it down to lack of preparation and poor conditioning. Duran should not have fought a rematch with Leonard for at least a year. In retrospect it might've been a better thing if Duran had lost the first fight, but would Leonard have given him a rematch? Duran had some good wins in the 80's beating Moore and Cuevas, but he was beaten by all the elite fighters of the time in Benitez, Hearns and Hagler. He was still a good fighter post 'No Mas', no longer a great one. If you look closely at Duran in Leonard 1 as the ref gives his centre ring instructions you see a man possesed by boxing, the intimidation factor alone already had Leonard beaten, you can see Leonard looking uncomfortable at the stare down as he glanced towards the floor, he was wondering what in the hell am i a doing here? That intimidation all vanished after 'No Mas' as the boxing world discovered Duran's lack of discipline outside the ring with regards to training and looking after himself. I suspect that Duran thought he had already reached the mountain top, saying to himself " i have nothing else to prove?" He follows up his loss to Wilfred Benitez at 152lbs to average pug Kirkland Laing. Duran had lost control of his body.
    Duran really should've finished after being destroyed by the 7 years younger and hungrier Thomas Hearns in a fight that really signaled the end of Roberto Duran. I still don't know how a 38 year old Duran beat Iran Barkley years later, that was a truly remarkable effort.....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    I think Napoles beats him. In my mind Napoles is the second best welter of all time and I think he'd give Robinson all he could handle. Curry, at his peak, was very good and Duran was only a very good welter on one night. I think Duran would beat Cotto more times than not.
    One fight I remember at the time, was Duran V Palomino that is one of the best fights I
    have seen, at welterweight, Carlos was no bum he was a excellent fighter.
    Duran V Moore he ripped that title away from Moore, that night a young hunger Champ
    gets schooled , by a washed up DURAN or so people were thinking.
    Richie the Moore fight was at LMW , not welter.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    957
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    I think Napoles beats him. In my mind Napoles is the second best welter of all time and I think he'd give Robinson all he could handle. Curry, at his peak, was very good and Duran was only a very good welter on one night. I think Duran would beat Cotto more times than not.
    One fight I remember at the time, was Duran V Palomino that is one of the best fights I
    have seen, at welterweight, Carlos was no bum he was a excellent fighter.
    Duran V Moore he ripped that title away from Moore, that night a young hunger Champ
    gets schooled , by a washed up DURAN or so people were thinking.
    Richie the Moore fight was at LMW , not welter.
    I no but I could not help myself.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,048
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    I think Napoles works all 3 out by fights ends and takes them. Welter wasn't a transition point for him it was his career and was as complete a thinking boxer with pop as there was.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How does Duran fair against these Welterweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    I think Napoles beats him. In my mind Napoles is the second best welter of all time and I think he'd give Robinson all he could handle. Curry, at his peak, was very good and Duran was only a very good welter on one night. I think Duran would beat Cotto more times than not.

    I picked Napoles also and immediately. I think Duran beats Cotto and Curry but that's if I were to freeze frame the Duran that fought Ray the first time. Btw it amazes me just how fast Duran out grew 147 given how long he stayed at 135. Ray knew that and its why he pushed and got the rematch 6 months later.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. To those who think the decision was fair..........
    By TitoFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 06-11-2012, 10:01 PM
  2. I think it's only fair and right.............
    By BIG H in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-25-2010, 02:45 PM
  3. Darchinyan/Hatton/Duran Duran
    By Greig in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-02-2007, 01:45 AM
  4. 90s Welterweights vs 2000 Welterweights
    By The Rookie Fan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-30-2007, 02:19 PM
  5. how would dlh fair against JT?
    By LawHoops in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-20-2006, 09:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing