Groves eyes Dirrell shot and Froch trilogy

[Primo Carnera]

Im meaning that he wont reach any higher than he has. He may win a WBF belt (if it still exists) and a pize fighter tournament but I cant really see him getting through 12 rounds with any of the champs. He looks too fragile. He slows down, his chin isn't great and his defensive skills







aren't very good either. He
literally just stood right in front of Froch with his hands round his face looking at the floor in the first fight. Just went in to a shell. In the second he got caught with a punch he should have seen a mile off. It was a strong shot but wouldn't have
landed on most fighters and if it did,
I cant see someone like Kessler looking like he'd just been shot in the head!

He has just lost by KO in his last two fights.....

Ok , so Froch beat him twice,but if Groves is only worthy of a WBF belt or Prizefighter, then what does that say about Froch? And in the 1st fight, when did he "literally just stand
right in front of Froch with his hands
round his face looking at the floor?"
Groves gave Froch all the trouble he could handle in the 1st fight and until the knockout in the 2nd fight, it had been pretty even and Groves was arguably beginning to get on
top. However, the finish was
conclusive and fair play to Froch for that, but if Groves is shit, Froch ain't much better.

Froch ain't much better? 2 stoppage wins over Groves and Froch ain't
much better than Groves?


Groves had his chance and just didn't look prepared. He shot his bolt early. He tried not to in the second fight but it didn't help.

Whether you think the stoppage in the 1st fight was right or not, nobody can deny that Groves was having the better of it at least. In the 2nd fight , before the KO, there was nothing in the fight , but like I said before,credit to Froch. Overall, Froch hardly showed that he's some sort of phenomenon . I agree that Groves had his chance and blew it and shouldn't be looking for another go . He's got to live with it and get on with his career.
But on the strength of those 2 fights, you can't say that Froch is some sort of legend and Groves is a piece of shit!
Infact, the only legendary thing that Froch had coming out of those fights was his ability to take so many punches clean on the jaw and survive!
If Froch is good/great then Groves ain't bad, or if Groves is shite, then Froch is pretty average.
What's it to be?