The fact is Wlad would have knocked out young George Foreman.
The fact is Wlad would have knocked out young George Foreman.
NO WAY!!! wtf--- George Foreman would eat Wlad for breakfast lıke a chıcken leg!
wlad had more skill but in no way does he beat a young foreman. foreman had a solid chin and hit like a monster. you can bet his trainer would tell him to just walk forward and throw as many punches as he could. i dont see wlad lasting more than 2 rounds. terrible style match up.
I agree with you on George being a bad style match up for Wlad. George always had a GREAT CHIN and would close the gap. Where smaller guys allow Wlad to hold and lean on them, I see George being strong enough to manhandle him, push him off and land the one-two. I don't see Wlad taking George's punch very well at all either. There is always the chance that it goes like the first Sam Peter fight did for Wlad, but I think George was a much better fighter and would likely stop him.
I think Lennox and young George would have been a great fight. Lennox was a little sturdier than Wlad, but he also would have been put to sleep if caught with a good shot from Foreman. I favor Lennox in that fight by decision after some shaky moments, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if George caught him and stopped him.
At the 1968 Olympic Games {October 1968} ~ Mexico City, Mexico
Finals
USSR Heavyweight ~ Ionas Chepulis
Howard Cosell lead us to believe that Ionas Chepulis was some kind of incredible and unbeatable Amateur Heavyweight.
He built the Russian into some sort of 'unstoppable tank'. He actually called him a 'Soviet Tank'. One that 'Mortar Shells'
bounce off of.
Howard Cosell >
"Ionas Chepulis could be ranked in the Top 15 of the Professional Ranks right now. He's had over 200-Bouts, and won
185 of them. He's as strong as Joe Frazier, and he looks bigger as well. He's real strong and clubs you with heavy
arms, and wears you down."
Truth,
Ionas {Age; 29 years, 2 months} was a good-and-strong Russian Heavyweight, but Ionas was far from the best that Country
had to offer.
Yes, Ionas was experienced, as he had been boxing for 10-Years. But all his bouts had been in Russia, and the 1968 Olympic Games
would be his '1st' International Tournament.
Ionas, at 6' 1" and 203 lbs. was solid, and he did have an impressive record of 185-22 {87 KO's} when he entered the Olympic Games.
But, He was 'never' a USSR National Champion. His performances at the Soviet Championships >
* 1965 National Championships > 'Silver Medalist'
* 1966 National Championships > 'Bronze Medalist'
* 1968 National Championships > 'Silver Medalist'
Ionas had lost in the Soviet Championship Finals only 3-Months earlier {July 1968} when he was soundly beaten by Alexander Vasyushkin.
Ionas who was Lithuanian, did win that National Championship 4-Times {1963, 1964, 1966 and 1967}. He also won the 1962 Baltic Championships.
Ionas did have a great start at the 1968 Olympic Games, when he won all bouts by stoppage.
Preliminary .........* TKO 3 ~ Billy Wells {Great Britain}
Quarter-Finals .... * KO 3 ~ Bernd Anders {East Germany}
Semi-Finals ........ * TKO 2 ~ Joaquin Rocha {Mexico}
Last edited by Bill Paxtom; 09-30-2014 at 09:40 PM.
I can definitely see Lewis winning but his main problem was that he seemed to get intimidated pretty easily. He also had a few really bad fights. Lewis on a good day would beat foreman, but in general it would be a toss up because you aren't sure which Lewis is showing up.
I do not think Lennox got intimidated by anyone. He beat fearsome punchers like Razor, Golota, Grant, Mercer, Tua and was never intimidated by them. You could criticse Lennox for taking people for granted but even he would never do that against Foreman.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Lewıs always moved fast agaınst the bıg bombers---he wasted no tıme agaınst Grant, Golota, Morrıson, Brıggs. all bıg punchers. But ıf he treıd that wıth George ıt would have backfıred. YOu dont punch wıth a puncher, and though LOennox was ındeed a bıg puncher, I gıve George the sıgnıfıcant nod about beıng the BETTER of the 2 punchers. Foreman-Lewıs would not have gone 4 rounds. George Foreman KO 3 or KO 4. Baddest-ass puncher I ever seen and he ALWAYS got the job done. Except ın the Congo---but the ropes was loose![]()
The Sam Peter fight is a good comparison. Wlad fought a strong guy who lacked skill and got dropped multiple times. The difference is that foreman is a top 10 HW of all time while people was fortunate to ever be in the top 10 HW's of his horrible era. Wlad wouldn't know what to do when foreman just pushed him when wlad would try to clinch.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks