Advice on the Proper stance from the GREATS

[jms]

Honestly I think you should stop looking to all these different sources. You're just confusing yourself. Not everyone teaches boxing the same way, and not every great fighter makes a great teacher.

[BCBUD]

Honestly I think you should stop looking to all these different sources. You're just confusing yourself. Not everyone teaches boxing the same way, and not every great fighter makes a great teacher.

It great kindness and respect for my elders, might I ask for your credentials...and why should I stop isn't it all about symmetry and trigonometry and geospatial engineering.
Honestly I declare Scrap to be a geospatial engineer so I grant him the highest level of respect.

[jms]

Honestly I think you should stop looking to all these different sources. You're just confusing yourself. Not everyone teaches boxing the same way, and not every great fighter makes a great teacher.

It great kindness and respect for my elders, might I ask for your credentials...and why should I stop isn't it all about symmetry and trigonometry and geospatial engineering.
Honestly I declare Scrap to be a geospatial engineer so I grant him the highest level of respect.

You missed my point. I'm saying that regardless of credentials people are gonna tell you different things. And considering you've even been misinterpreting a lot of what scrap says the idea is people learn differently and not everyone benefits from so many different sources. To learn that way without confusion you have to think very critically about everything you come across.

[BCBUD]

I found this gem of Riddick Bowe telling us of his game plan to fight and beat Lennox Lewis. Most importantly look how level his shoulders are. Let's see it you spot it Bowe throwing the hook of the front foot.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=J4I3VBUSgfc 11:00

[BCBUD]

The faster and object travels the less air resistantance there is.when the shoulders are square and level a punch travels much faster and further.now if one shoulder was higher than the other say the left side was higher and the right shoulder was lower this would decrease the initial propulsion and velocity of a punch therefore there would be much greater drag.Ernie Shavers shoulders are level and squarehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eevCxv2fGRY

[Scrap]

The faster and object travels the less air resistantance there is.when the shoulders are square and level a punch travels much faster and further.now if one shoulder was higher than the other say the left side was higher and the right shoulder was lower this would decrease the initial propulsion and velocity of a punch therefore there would be much greater drag.Ernie Shavers shoulders are level and squarehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eevCxv2fGRY

[SugarBoxing]

The faster and object travels the less air resistantance there is.when the shoulders are square and level a punch travels much faster and further.now if one shoulder was higher than the other say the left side was higher and the right shoulder was lower this would decrease the initial propulsion and velocity of a punch therefore there would be much greater drag.Ernie Shavers shoulders are level and squarehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eevCxv2fGRY

That's an interesting perspective. However, it is a bit naive, because this is only classical physics...

How about space-time curvature, fist-arm particle-wave duality, extremum of a Lagrangian for Higgs-fist and Sushi-roll interraction under the event horizon in subcritical temperatures of a ring consiting of neutrino particlas first minutes after the Big Bang?

[BCBUD]

The faster and object travels the less air resistantance there is.when the shoulders are square and level a punch travels much faster and further.now if one shoulder was higher than the other say the left side was higher and the right shoulder was lower this would decrease the initial propulsion and velocity of a punch therefore there would be much greater drag.Ernie Shavers shoulders are level and squarehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eevCxv2fGRY

That's an interesting perspective. However, it is a bit naive, because this is only classical physics...

How about space-time curvature, fist-arm particle-wave duality, extremum of a Lagrangian for Higgs-fist and Sushi-roll interraction under the event horizon in subcritical temperatures of a ring consiting of neutrino particlas first minutes after the Big Bang?

Haha talk nerdy to me jk... Doesn't the world spin laterally without having to start its motion from having the left side up and the right side down? I unceremoniously offer up one last nerdy brain fart. the shoulders are the spinning wheel of gyroscope.What makes my surmise axiomatic is angular momentum that which measures the amount of rotation taking into account is mass, shape and speed.
Now back to Lord of the Rings!