Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 168

Thread: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,773
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    The 70s will always take it, and I can't argue, but my personal favourite era is the late 80s to the late 90s. I think it's a really underrated time. It had a lot of depth and an abundance of really solid contenders. The 90s really speak for themselves, but I think Tyson's era goes under appreciated. Tony Tucker was a fucking monster.
    Yes Tucker and Briggs would have been a great if it was not for Tyson.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1001
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    The 70s will always take it, and I can't argue, but my personal favourite era is the late 80s to the late 90s. I think it's a really underrated time. It had a lot of depth and an abundance of really solid contenders. The 90s really speak for themselves, but I think Tyson's era goes under appreciated. Tony Tucker was a fucking monster.
    Yes Tucker and Briggs would have been a great if it was not for Tyson.
    Is this a joke?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,773
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    The 70s will always take it, and I can't argue, but my personal favourite era is the late 80s to the late 90s. I think it's a really underrated time. It had a lot of depth and an abundance of really solid contenders. The 90s really speak for themselves, but I think Tyson's era goes under appreciated. Tony Tucker was a fucking monster.
    Yes Tucker and Briggs would have been a great if it was not for Tyson.
    Is this a joke?
    Ask @Beanflicker who started it.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1379
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Tony Tucker was a beast, he had guys relinquishing titles so they wouldn't have to fight him.

    He broke his hand a few days before the Tyson fight and then shattered it early in the fight, shit happens in boxing, Tyson was a beast who probably would have beaten him anyway, but Tucker was a bad motherfucker. Michael Spinks ducked him hard.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,265
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5145
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Tony Tucker was a beast, he had guys relinquishing titles so they wouldn't have to fight him.

    He broke his hand a few days before the Tyson fight and then shattered it early in the fight, shit happens in boxing, Tyson was a beast who probably would have beaten him anyway, but Tucker was a bad motherfucker. Michael Spinks ducked him hard.
    Tucker was the lifelong beneficiary of Don King low balling people and generous rankings late on. The guy had big natural skill and ability for sure, but I really doubt Spinks and Foreman were afraid of the man. Asking a lineal champ to settle on a fraction when he was able to make 7,8 times that is a non starter and bad business, King at his calculated finest with all roads to Tyson either way.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,773
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Tony Tucker was a beast, he had guys relinquishing titles so they wouldn't have to fight him.

    He broke his hand a few days before the Tyson fight and then shattered it early in the fight, shit happens in boxing, Tyson was a beast who probably would have beaten him anyway, but Tucker was a bad motherfucker. Michael Spinks ducked him hard.
    Tucker was the lifelong beneficiary of Don King low balling people and generous rankings late on. The guy had big natural skill and ability for sure, but I really doubt Spinks and Foreman were afraid of the man. Asking a lineal champ to settle on a fraction when he was able to make 7,8 times that is a non starter and bad business, King at his calculated finest with all roads to Tyson either way.
    Tony Tucker: My right hand was broken when I fought him I knew Tyson
    couldn’t beat me. A couple days before I was sparring against
    a guy named Young Joe Louis. This guy was doing a lot of
    talking bad about me. I heard this from my sparring partners.
    So I chose him to spar against first because I was gonna put
    him down. I was hitting him real good when I heard a pop in my
    hand When I went back to the corner I knew I had hurt it bad.
    The doctor said I had a small hand fracture. They said I would
    need therapy and to not use it for ten days. I had to fight Tyson
    in less than that. I went in determined though. I was very
    apprehensive to attack Tyson due to the hand. I hit him with a
    right uppercut early and my hand just shattered. It was the
    worst pain ever. I still went on though, that’s why I did all those
    antics and everything. I was supposed to beat this guy, but
    how could I with one hand. With two hands I would have
    knocked Mike Tyson out.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1001
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Tony Tucker was a beast, he had guys relinquishing titles so they wouldn't have to fight him.

    He broke his hand a few days before the Tyson fight and then shattered it early in the fight, shit happens in boxing, Tyson was a beast who probably would have beaten him anyway, but Tucker was a bad motherfucker. Michael Spinks ducked him hard.
    Tucker was the lifelong beneficiary of Don King low balling people and generous rankings late on. The guy had big natural skill and ability for sure, but I really doubt Spinks and Foreman were afraid of the man. Asking a lineal champ to settle on a fraction when he was able to make 7,8 times that is a non starter and bad business, King at his calculated finest with all roads to Tyson either way.
    agree 100%

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1379
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Tony Tucker was a beast, he had guys relinquishing titles so they wouldn't have to fight him.

    He broke his hand a few days before the Tyson fight and then shattered it early in the fight, shit happens in boxing, Tyson was a beast who probably would have beaten him anyway, but Tucker was a bad motherfucker. Michael Spinks ducked him hard.
    Tucker was the lifelong beneficiary of Don King low balling people and generous rankings late on. The guy had big natural skill and ability for sure, but I really doubt Spinks and Foreman were afraid of the man. Asking a lineal champ to settle on a fraction when he was able to make 7,8 times that is a non starter and bad business, King at his calculated finest with all roads to Tyson either way.
    I get that Tony Tucker was not a big name, but I think you're downplaying the man's skill. The guy was a fantastic boxer, great jab, mobile, and had huge power in both hands. He was a nasty fight and in his prime I say he was a tough night for any HW you could name.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,265
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5145
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Tony Tucker was a beast, he had guys relinquishing titles so they wouldn't have to fight him.

    He broke his hand a few days before the Tyson fight and then shattered it early in the fight, shit happens in boxing, Tyson was a beast who probably would have beaten him anyway, but Tucker was a bad motherfucker. Michael Spinks ducked him hard.
    Tucker was the lifelong beneficiary of Don King low balling people and generous rankings late on. The guy had big natural skill and ability for sure, but I really doubt Spinks and Foreman were afraid of the man. Asking a lineal champ to settle on a fraction when he was able to make 7,8 times that is a non starter and bad business, King at his calculated finest with all roads to Tyson either way.
    I get that Tony Tucker was not a big name, but I think you're downplaying the man's skill. The guy was a fantastic boxer, great jab, mobile, and had huge power in both hands. He was a nasty fight and in his prime I say he was a tough night for any HW you could name.
    Oh no, he absolutely had skill, absolute. But he was similar to many of time as he was also a self saboteur with substance abuse, jumbled management and lack of focus and motivation. I'm still not convinced he wasn't outhustled and boxed vs Orlin Norris. His skill was obvious, its not as if he lacked ample opportunity to show it? But no matter the era if your mind ain't right and the fire wavering, skill means nothing. Having that leech King pulling his strings was a catch 22. His name didn't need to be huge with that connect.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 11-07-2009, 05:48 PM
  2. Tributes to a talented amateur boxer!
    By yvonne in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2008, 08:43 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-07-2007, 01:43 PM
  4. Who is the most talented boxer of all time?
    By cockey cockney in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 12:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing