Re: Eubank Sr. the REASON...

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Eubank didn't win .
The End.
One judge thought he did.
I was thinking about split decisions last night. If one judge thinks you have won its unfair that you get a loss.
Calzaghe-Hopkins was a SD. Who won?
Eubank didn't need to crawl around on the floor looking for respite. Hopkins didn't finish the fight knocking Calzaghe all over the shop. Hopkins was fighting in front of his countrymen in his country.
That didn't matter to the judge that scored it for Hopkins. So by your rationale it's unfair that Hopkins lost to Calzaghe. You set the criteria not me. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks