Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 168

Thread: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Dear god max is back i agree Wald kills Tunney i don't even know why some are trying to even say other wise even its just fucking stupid. Also Max come on dude Wald got knocked the fuck out by contenders from the 90's and his Brother got his faced smashed by a 38 year Lewis 90's is the best era by far in boxing more so then even the 70's. This era is better then a lot of eras i think the 80's had some good fighters hell Foreman and Holmes could hang with these guys but 60's and down there just no fucking way dude.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    No one is saying Wlad would not beat Tunney but Max does not read and digest what i write in very simple plain language.

    It is about skill, heart, stamina, chin, technique, power, being a champion, consistency, depth in quality the division all which is lacking now except Wlad. It has been dire for years!

    (I an not going to mention if Wlad lived in those times he would not be as big or if Tunney was in this time he would have been bigger.)
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1020
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    The 70's when most people didn't really understand how dangerous boxing was to one's health. Just seeing what it's done to Ali, has been enough to keep many of the best athletes from pursuing a career in boxing. The risk reward is just too much. And then there are other factors were boxers are still exploited. Today, when we see a gifted athlete, he dominates.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    636
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    The 70's when most people didn't really understand how dangerous boxing was to one's health. Just seeing what it's done to Ali, has been enough to keep many of the best athletes from pursuing a career in boxing. The risk reward is just too much. And then there are other factors were boxers are still exploited. Today, when we see a gifted athlete, he dominates.
    Muhammad Ali was unique in that he TRIED to get hit with punches. He never developed any reflexes and merely won (if you can call it that) by outstaminising his opponents!

    Hardly any other boxers become so brain damaged as that today because they actively TRY NOT to get hit!

    Perhaps we can thank Ali for the motivation for modern boxers to develop a defence!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1020
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    The 70's when most people didn't really understand how dangerous boxing was to one's health. Just seeing what it's done to Ali, has been enough to keep many of the best athletes from pursuing a career in boxing. The risk reward is just too much. And then there are other factors were boxers are still exploited. Today, when we see a gifted athlete, he dominates.
    Muhammad Ali was unique in that he TRIED to get hit with punches. He never developed any reflexes and merely won (if you can call it that) by outstaminising his opponents!

    Hardly any other boxers become so brain damaged as that today because they actively TRY NOT to get hit!
    8
    Perhaps we can thank Ali for the motivation for modern boxers to develop a defence!
    Where did you get so enlightened an Ali's strategy in the ring? Do you mean the rope a dope? I have no idea what you mean when you say Ali never developed reflexes and just won? Can you elaborate so I might be more enlightened.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    636
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    The 70's when most people didn't really understand how dangerous boxing was to one's health. Just seeing what it's done to Ali, has been enough to keep many of the best athletes from pursuing a career in boxing. The risk reward is just too much. And then there are other factors were boxers are still exploited. Today, when we see a gifted athlete, he dominates.
    Muhammad Ali was unique in that he TRIED to get hit with punches. He never developed any reflexes and merely won (if you can call it that) by outstaminising his opponents!

    Hardly any other boxers become so brain damaged as that today because they actively TRY NOT to get hit!
    8
    Perhaps we can thank Ali for the motivation for modern boxers to develop a defence!
    Where did you get so enlightened an Ali's strategy in the ring? Do you mean the rope a dope? I have no idea what you mean when you say Ali never developed reflexes and just won? Can you elaborate so I might be more enlightened.
    This is my analysis of Muhammad Ali...

    I consider 2 versions..

    Muhammad Ali I: Was very fast of hand and feet, was also longer than most of his opponents. He had, as always, great stamina. This Ali was CHINNY (and obviously looked it).

    This Clay/Ali performed a "merry-go-round" of his opponents where he was always out of range so his opponents couldn't hit him. But most of the time he couldn't hit his opponents either. He darted in to land his own shots and then get immediately out of range. He avoided much punishment in his first career this way, because he speed, allied to his length advantage enabled him to play tag.

    However, you can already see that this Clay/Ali, when he remained for anytime in punching range of his opponents, was hit even by the SLOWEST of punches! Break out the old black and whites and have a good look again, but this time with a critical eye and forget about all the myths you've been fed.

    Clay was decked by 185lb Cooper a straight up light HW and a straight up BUM (see record). No HW boxer today would ever be decked (and basically KOed) by a guy like that!

    Muhammad Ali II: This Ali was strong for the era, he had a harder chin, even an iron chin for the criteria of the day. And he had great stamina as always. This Ali was still one of the tallest boxers but was no longer particularly tall. And this Ali had lost his foot speed and most of his handspeed. He had become a slow, plodding overweight. His new tactic was basically landing some wind maker shots and then wrestling and fouling.

    Because he no longer had his speed, the truth about Ali's reflexes was totally exposed, he had none! Because earlier, he never had any need to develop any!

    What followed is probably one of the most disgraceful careers recorded. Being smashed from pillar to post in nearly all of his fights.

    I hope I was thorough enough.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1020
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    The 70's when most people didn't really understand how dangerous boxing was to one's health. Just seeing what it's done to Ali, has been enough to keep many of the best athletes from pursuing a career in boxing. The risk reward is just too much. And then there are other factors were boxers are still exploited. Today, when we see a gifted athlete, he dominates.
    Muhammad Ali was unique in that he TRIED to get hit with punches. He never developed any reflexes and merely won (if you can call it that) by outstaminising his opponents!

    Hardly any other boxers become so brain damaged as that today because they actively TRY NOT to get hit!
    8
    Perhaps we can thank Ali for the motivation for modern boxers to develop a defence!
    Where did you get so enlightened an Ali's strategy in the ring? Do you mean the rope a dope? I have no idea what you mean when you say Ali never developed reflexes and just won? Can you elaborate so I might be more enlightened.
    This is my analysis of Muhammad Ali...

    I consider 2 versions..

    Muhammad Ali I: Was very fast of hand and feet, was also longer than most of his opponents. He had, as always, great stamina. This Ali was CHINNY (and obviously looked it).

    This Clay/Ali performed a "merry-go-round" of his opponents where he was always out of range so his opponents couldn't hit him. But most of the time he couldn't hit his opponents either. He darted in to land his own shots and then get immediately out of range. He avoided much punishment in his first career this way, because he speed, allied to his length advantage enabled him to play tag.

    However, you can already see that this Clay/Ali, when he remained for anytime in punching range of his opponents, was hit even by the SLOWEST of punches! Break out the old black and whites and have a good look again, but this time with a critical eye and forget about all the myths you've been fed.

    Clay was decked by 185lb Cooper a straight up light HW and a straight up BUM (see record). No HW boxer today would ever be decked (and basically KOed) by a guy like that!

    Muhammad Ali II: This Ali was strong for the era, he had a harder chin, even an iron chin for the criteria of the day. And he had great stamina as always. This Ali was still one of the tallest boxers but was no longer particularly tall. And this Ali had lost his foot speed and most of his handspeed. He had become a slow, plodding overweight. His new tactic was basically landing some wind maker shots and then wrestling and fouling.

    Because he no longer had his speed, the truth about Ali's reflexes was totally exposed, he had none! Because earlier, he never had any need to develop any!

    What followed is probably one of the most disgraceful careers recorded. Being smashed from pillar to post in nearly all of his fights.

    I hope I was thorough enough.
    You're joking...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    636
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Dear god max is back i agree Wald kills Tunney i don't even know why some are trying to even say other wise even its just fucking stupid. Also Max come on dude Wald got knocked the fuck out by contenders from the 90's and his Brother got his faced smashed by a 38 year Lewis 90's is the best era by far in boxing more so then even the 70's. This era is better then a lot of eras i think the 80's had some good fighters hell Foreman and Holmes could hang with these guys but 60's and down there just no fucking way dude.
    I do have a special connection with the 90's boxers too because grew up idolising them.

    There is essentially no difference between then and now. The ONLY difference is the hyping up and the fame names. American media can make and break stars like no other.

    I think Vitali, although the stoppage was warranted, proved he was better than Lewis in that fight (obviously so did Lewis think so, Vitali retired him!)

    Wladimir had hardly any losses which serve to prove nothing.

    Both Klitschko's would have dominated the 90's exactly the same. Most ppl know that.

    As you know I think the 60's and 70's is probably the lowest point in HW boxing but I atleast like that you acknowledge at some point, ancient fighters become uncompetitive with modern ones. That's something!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 11-07-2009, 05:48 PM
  2. Tributes to a talented amateur boxer!
    By yvonne in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2008, 08:43 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-07-2007, 01:43 PM
  4. Who is the most talented boxer of all time?
    By cockey cockney in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 12:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing