Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 33

Thread: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Walcott...

    Another famous border-line bum
    You know shit about boxing if you claim Walcott was a bum. You are a disgrace and should never be allowed on the internet again.
    Joe Walcott.. 51-18

    Toplist material right there.

    Current fighters could never dream of such a successful career :lol1:
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,228
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3099
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Walcott...

    Another famous border-line bum
    You know shit about boxing if you claim Walcott was a bum. You are a disgrace and should never be allowed on the internet again.
    Joe Walcott.. 51-18

    Toplist material right there.

    Current fighters could never dream of such a successful career :lol1:
    Have you never heard great fighters like Hopkins and Toney refer to Walcott’s moves and skill in the ring?

    He fought in a day when records were not padded and protected as they are now.

    Your stupidity knows no bounds.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Walcott...

    Another famous border-line bum
    You know shit about boxing if you claim Walcott was a bum. You are a disgrace and should never be allowed on the internet again.
    Joe Walcott.. 51-18

    Toplist material right there.

    Current fighters could never dream of such a successful career :lol1:
    Have you never heard great fighters like Hopkins and Toney refer to Walcott’s moves and skill in the ring?

    He fought in a day when records were not padded and protected as they are now.

    Your stupidity knows no bounds.
    He fought in an incredibly weak era after war where a boxer like that could possibly become HW champion.

    The records were MORE padded than now with guys who were not even training properly or enough. We can take a look at Walcotts opponents opponents too and see some even MORE shocking results. Not only do they have even more terrible records, but these records consist of barely any real HW fights and some even as low as bloody featherweight!

    Hopkins and Toney can pay reverence as much as they like!

    Hopkins and Toney achieved far better records against FAR better opposition from start of career, to finish, any way you slice it, and would have both knocked Walcott out easily. Basic fact!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Walcott...

    Another famous border-line bum
    You know shit about boxing if you claim Walcott was a bum. You are a disgrace and should never be allowed on the internet again.
    Joe Walcott.. 51-18

    Toplist material right there.

    Current fighters could never dream of such a successful career :lol1:
    name a current fighter bwahaha who could fight Joe Louis 5 times , Ezzard Charles 5 times, Marciano 2 times, etc... You are fuill of shit. Wlacott fought every single one of those fights competitively, and won a few too. "current fighters' bwahahaha Maxpower put down THE CRACK PIPE YO.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,228
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3099
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Walcott...

    Another famous border-line bum
    You know shit about boxing if you claim Walcott was a bum. You are a disgrace and should never be allowed on the internet again.
    Joe Walcott.. 51-18

    Toplist material right there.

    Current fighters could never dream of such a successful career :lol1:
    Have you never heard great fighters like Hopkins and Toney refer to Walcott’s moves and skill in the ring?

    He fought in a day when records were not padded and protected as they are now.

    Your stupidity knows no bounds.
    He fought in an incredibly weak era after war where a boxer like that could possibly become HW champion.

    The records were MORE padded than now with guys who were not even training properly or enough. We can take a look at Walcotts opponents opponents too and see some even MORE shocking results. Not only do they have even more terrible records, but these records consist of barely any real HW fights and some even as low as bloody featherweight!

    Hopkins and Toney can pay reverence as much as they like!

    Hopkins and Toney achieved far better records against FAR better opposition from start of career, to finish, any way you slice it, and would have both knocked Walcott out easily. Basic fact!
    You thInk a lightweight and an overweight heavyweight could beat a former heavyweight champion like Jersey Joe Walcott? You are mad! Completely mad.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2076
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Bit daft to compare old guys to new... Most Light Heavyweights are bigger today, especially before they've sweated down to 179lb

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    683
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    From best to worst I would go...

    1. Tunney (even though he is a punk and a chicken for not fighting black fighters)
    2. Dempsey
    3. Baer
    4. Schmeling
    5. Walcott
    6.
    7.
    8.
    9.
    10. Bradock

    Braddock isn't in the class of those guys, he got lucky and was a club fighter at best.

    Max Schmeling was the best human being of those guys, he was a true gentleman and hero.
    LOL on the Tunney comment.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    683
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Walcott...

    Another famous border-line bum
    You know shit about boxing if you claim Walcott was a bum. You are a disgrace and should never be allowed on the internet again.
    Joe Walcott.. 51-18

    Toplist material right there.

    Current fighters could never dream of such a successful career :lol1:
    Have you never heard great fighters like Hopkins and Toney refer to Walcott’s moves and skill in the ring?

    He fought in a day when records were not padded and protected as they are now.

    Your stupidity knows no bounds.
    He fought in an incredibly weak era after war where a boxer like that could possibly become HW champion.

    The records were MORE padded than now with guys who were not even training properly or enough. We can take a look at Walcotts opponents opponents too and see some even MORE shocking results. Not only do they have even more terrible records, but these records consist of barely any real HW fights and some even as low as bloody featherweight!

    Hopkins and Toney can pay reverence as much as they like!

    Hopkins and Toney achieved far better records against FAR better opposition from start of career, to finish, any way you slice it, and would have both knocked Walcott out easily. Basic fact!
    You thInk a lightweight and an overweight heavyweight could beat a former heavyweight champion like Jersey Joe Walcott? You are mad! Completely mad.
    My favorite fighter -who up and coming champs fought to {{{PAD}}} their record is the GREAT Reggie Strickland. 66 wins 276 losses.
    Not a 1940, 50,60's or 70's fighter.
    LHW champ Tavaris Cloud was the last one to make use of him- & couldn't stop a fighter used for record-padding

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,900
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    896
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    But I suppose, as @greynotsoold points out, you can only judge a fighter's greatness by the criteria of his era...
    Holy Fuck!!!! You can teach a rock to think!

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Walcott...

    Another famous border-line bum
    You know shit about boxing if you claim Walcott was a bum. You are a disgrace and should never be allowed on the internet again.
    Joe Walcott.. 51-18

    Toplist material right there.

    Current fighters could never dream of such a successful career :lol1:
    name a current fighter bwahaha who could fight Joe Louis 5 times , Ezzard Charles 5 times, Marciano 2 times, etc... You are fuill of shit. Wlacott fought every single one of those fights competitively, and won a few too. "current fighters' bwahahaha Maxpower put down THE CRACK PIPE YO.
    Ok,

    I think Jean MArc Mormeck could have fought all of those fighters and BEAT the lot of them!

    Jean Marc Mormeck is the heaviest, the strongest, the most skilled, the fastest, the most powerful of all of them by FAR.

    You have done what I call a "nostalgic assessment", let's get real here!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by ruthless rocco View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    But I suppose, as @greynotsoold points out, you can only judge a fighter's greatness by the criteria of his era...
    Holy Fuck!!!! You can teach a rock to think!
    Fuck you! He pointed out a simple fact that the sport has evolves, kind of like I've been saying as well. Except he is trying to spin it as if the sport is "devolving", becoming progressively weaker as usual for an OTNB poster. The extrapolation until even further past times all the way back to bare knuckles reveals that a boxer then and today, are hard to compare by record and skillset because they were so different.

    OF COURSE I can agree with that!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Walcott...

    Another famous border-line bum
    You know shit about boxing if you claim Walcott was a bum. You are a disgrace and should never be allowed on the internet again.
    Joe Walcott.. 51-18

    Toplist material right there.

    Current fighters could never dream of such a successful career :lol1:
    Have you never heard great fighters like Hopkins and Toney refer to Walcott’s moves and skill in the ring?

    He fought in a day when records were not padded and protected as they are now.

    Your stupidity knows no bounds.
    He fought in an incredibly weak era after war where a boxer like that could possibly become HW champion.

    The records were MORE padded than now with guys who were not even training properly or enough. We can take a look at Walcotts opponents opponents too and see some even MORE shocking results. Not only do they have even more terrible records, but these records consist of barely any real HW fights and some even as low as bloody featherweight!

    Hopkins and Toney can pay reverence as much as they like!

    Hopkins and Toney achieved far better records against FAR better opposition from start of career, to finish, any way you slice it, and would have both knocked Walcott out easily. Basic fact!
    You thInk a lightweight and an overweight heavyweight could beat a former heavyweight champion like Jersey Joe Walcott? You are mad! Completely mad.
    Take a look at Hopkins LOL That's no lightweight mate! And fuck me, as if Toney would even bother to step in the ring with Walcott! Toney would have had tougher sparring sessions than that!

    On the contrary it is YOU who are mad to assume Walcott has any chances whatsoever here and it is an insult to Hopkins and a STINKING insult to Toney!

    I doesn't matter if Toney was fat. Toney was HEAVY!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    WELCOME TO OTNB LAND PEOPLE!

    The magical place where if an ancient fighter sustains double digit losses, it's a sign of character LOL

    And if a modern fighter suffers few, sometimes even just a single loss, he is a bum!

    It's such extreme bias and swaggery that drives the mythology machine to this very day.

    Problem is, for most of boxing history the American hype machine could get away with it because there was no access to boxrec or online video.

    Unfortunately for them we can now SEE how bad they were with our very own eyes.

    Exposed.
    Exposed.
    Exposed.

    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    WELCOME TO OTNB LAND PEOPLE!

    The magical place where if an ancient fighter sustains double digit losses, it's a sign of character LOL

    And if a modern fighter suffers few, sometimes even just a single loss, he is a bum!

    It's such extreme bias and swaggery that drives the mythology machine to this very day.

    Problem is, for most of boxing history the American hype machine could get away with it because there was no access to boxrec or online video.

    Unfortunately for them we can now SEE how bad they were with our very own eyes.

    Exposed.
    Exposed.
    Exposed.

    Jersey Joe Walcott would wipe the living shit out of James Toney.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Schmeling, Braddock, Baer, Dempsey, Tunney, Walcott=Top 15 ATGs

    Oh really..

    When was the last time you seen him fight? Who was it, and how did he go?

    You know that isn't true.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. 1933 Max Baer vs Max Schmeling - a remarkable fight HD!!!
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-13-2013, 01:55 PM
  2. Jack Dempsey vs. Jersey Joe Walcott.
    By VG_Addict in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-17-2013, 06:45 PM
  3. jersey joe walcott vs gene tunney
    By undefeated in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-27-2006, 03:25 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 01:25 AM
  5. Carnera v Sharkey II and Baer v Braddock
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-11-2006, 01:21 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing