Why on earth would the first Maidana fight be a loss?
Why on earth would the first Maidana fight be a loss?
If he had loss(es) I guess it would depend on who beat him and how.
Rather than claim he is undefeated, he'd claim he was robbed ala Bhop style & keep on fighting.
I think a loss would've required a rematch, to which he would've won-as did when his questionable victories were called into question
One thing for sure is that virtually all great fighters at some point got the benefit of the doubt.
Marciano was in a fight where his nose was near torn off. Any other fighter & it would've been stopped.
JCC got a gift draw vs Pernell.
Ali got gift wins like a kid gets gifts on Xmas.
Ray Leonard got a gift draw vs Hearns II..and stated he loss that fight hands down.
DLH got a gift win vs Quartey
Most big named fighters will always get the benefit of the doubt.
For the record, as close as the Castillo I fight was, I had Floyd winning 6-5-1, Floyd is undefeated.
I had the Castillo 1 fight a 6-6 draw but could easily see it 7-5 either way. I think that's the only disputable decision on Floyd's record.
To go 18 years without a loss in unbelievable on the world stage, considering all the killers that are out there, and all the crazy shit that can happen in a fight (cuts, injuries, bad decisions, ect).
It's skill, but it's also luck. The judges could have easily given the fight to Castillo. The judges could have given the fight to De La Hoya or Maidana (not that I think they won, but worse scorecards have been given).
David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks