Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
I gave it to Saunders by 2 rounds. The same score as I gave Saunders over Eubank. Some people on twitter gave the fight to Ryder. Both fights were clear in my opinion. Both were close but the right man won both.
I actually think I may have had Saunders by more than 2. Havent seen the fight in awhile. In any case I cant remember anyone argueing too much about the scorecards which would indicate a close and competitive fight.
Your opinion but even yourself don't have Ryder doing as well as Eubank did.
Ryder was younger and had less pro fights then Eubank had when they fought Saunders. Will you not take that into account for Ryder?
Saunders was slightly more experinced, had for the first time come to the scales looking like a boxer and had taken himself away on a training camp.

Had it been the Billy Joe who was turning up looking like a fat welter as he was in all his fights previous the. I think Eubank probably would have stopped him. The new fitness effort scraped him through that fight.

Conversely, had Saumders been in this shape and this focussed against Ryder the margin would have been much wider.
LOL. Is Saunders not like Chisora? Being fatter made him more durable. Thats why Eubank could rock him because he wasnt carrying the extra weight on the night