@ Smashup- Legit question. He was a measuring stick, buit how good of a measuring stick?
I guess it depends on the what the individual thought going into the fight.
We did have a few different opionions here. Questions both had to answer,
On one hand Stivern did his job like he was supposed to- he won the title.
Then there is Wilder's resume.
Was Malik a decent opponent going in? I dunno, subjective I guess to each of us.
or Audley Harrison? This is the guy Haye fought to get to Wlad. Was Audly that good then.. but not when Wilder fought him, he became something other than a worthy foe? He went 3-1 since-getting starched by Price, bad or good Wilder's resume? I dunno.
Liakhovhich was a world champ- & Wilder got that on his resume. When Helenious beat Liakhovich only 3 fights ago for him..was that a bum win his record? I'm not sure how much stock of Liakhovich dropped from that to Wilder.
To me Stiverne's measuring was-
Could Wilder go 12 rounds (stamina)-Yes
Could he take a punch from a guy who isn't called a pillow puncher? Yes
If adversity comes, can he deal with it (fractured) hand-Yes
Would he fall of his game and show his youth? (NO-he stuck to the plan;lead with the jab)
Question smashup- who would be a good measuring stick for him now & what do you think that would consist of?
I have no critique for you, just to learn from a different perspctive through lenses other than my own.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks