Wilder has 14 years on wlad. Too much advantage IMO.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Wilder has 14 years on wlad. Too much advantage IMO.
Wladimir wins every round and knocks Wilder out with almost certainty.
It comes down to a punchers chance for Wilder.
Thing is, I don't see Wilder landing anything much of great significance on Wlad and to be honest, I learned 2 things..
Wilder's power is not totally stunning as it was against bummy opponents, but still very hard of course and...
Wlad has a strong enough chin to take some of Wilder's shots should he land any anyway.
I would say it's a fat chance.
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
You fool! LOL
Lennox was 38 and beat Vitali.
Vitali retired unbeaten at 41.
Foreman bombed out guys at 45.
Holyfield took it to some strong fighters at his 40's.
Larry Holmes beat Ray Mercer at 42.
Wladimir's age is the new prime. He will start to decline before too much longer though, but even then can hang on to the top for a lot longer if he likes, he's good enough.
Recently, Thompson wasted David Price, a Wilder clone, and held his own against Pulev. In his 40's.
This ain't no track meet @brocktonblockbust, it's HW boxing.
Most whipper snappers know not to fuck with the silverbacks on the street. And the same applies to pro-boxers as well I reckon.
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks