This isn't a huge deal...I mean losing in the amateurs CAN be telling, but it can also be kind of pointless. Tyson got beat by Tillman as was noted before and Miguel Cotto was beaten by Abdullaev, both those losses were avenged in one sided fights, but every so often there's an amateur fight where it shows a flaw in a fighter's strategy or style. For example, Shane Mosley vs Vernon Forest. Forest beat him in the amateurs and owned him as a pro....sometimes that is the case but hell look at David Haye who lost to Odlanier Solis in the amateurs, now I HATE David Haye, but would anyone consider him an underdog vs Solis as a pro? I know I wouldn't!

I think Anthony Joshua has a very bright future ahead of him especially if he can quit being so stiff and loosen up a bit...I think his first loss will either come from him being outboxed because he's too stiff and loading up on punches or he'll just tire out from keeping himself that stiff. When you're always tight, and loading up like an Earnie Shavers or Gerry Cooney, or Frank Bruno, your punches get slower and you tire out faster because you're never resting between punches.