Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 75

Thread: David Haye- wasted talent?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    636
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Haye overacheived as a heavyweight.
    I don't buy that for a second! He EASILY beat every other heavyweight he fought and if you're going to tell me "Well those were handpicked opponents" it doesn't much matter they (aside from Monte Barrett) were all still highly rated at the time. I don't know if Haye truly believed he belonged or if he just didn't have the heart to do it, but shit he was certainly skilled enough to be the #2 man in the division he just had to go out and work for it and for whatever reason he didn't.
    Haye would not have lasted had it been early 1990's. He would have stayed at cruiserweight.
    I don't buy that either. Heavyweights were smaller then and regardless he didn't fight in the 90's and sans time machine he wouldn't so it's a moot point.
    I am saying if he did fight during that time he would have stayed at the lower weight.
    Yet a slower, shitter, featherfisted boxer of even smaller proportions, far less athletic and skilled and possibly even chinnier (Moorer) DID make it. In fact he even became HW champ.

    David Haye would have been one of Lennox's better opponents and would have thrashed most of the 90's HW's beyond any doubt. He was an excellent boxer. How can you take that much away from him?

    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    689
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Haye overacheived as a heavyweight.
    I don't buy that for a second! He EASILY beat every other heavyweight he fought and if you're going to tell me "Well those were handpicked opponents" it doesn't much matter they (aside from Monte Barrett) were all still highly rated at the time. I don't know if Haye truly believed he belonged or if he just didn't have the heart to do it, but shit he was certainly skilled enough to be the #2 man in the division he just had to go out and work for it and for whatever reason he didn't.
    Haye would not have lasted had it been early 1990's. He would have stayed at cruiserweight.
    I don't buy that either. Heavyweights were smaller then and regardless he didn't fight in the 90's and sans time machine he wouldn't so it's a moot point.
    I am saying if he did fight during that time he would have stayed at the lower weight.
    Yet a slower, shitter, featherfisted boxer of even smaller proportions, far less athletic and skilled and possibly even chinnier (Moorer) DID make it. In fact he even became HW champ.

    David Haye would have been one of Lennox's better opponents and would have thrashed most of the 90's HW's beyond any doubt. He was an excellent boxer. How can you take that much away from him?

    True Moorer proved chinny- but thats because he had a bangers mentality. Far too many bangers in the 90's who would've pressed Haye into a fight. Haye can outrun a giant of Wlad & Valuev, but the 90's HW's could cut the ring off. Haye loses 2 outta every 4 fights vs U pickem.

    Lewis thrashes Haye.

  3. #3
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Michael Moorer wasn't a bad fighter at all, he would have given Haye a fight but featherfisted? He was a good solid puncher, power in speed and combinations....he just fought stupidly vs Foreman.

    Moorer was a guy I wished fought other top contenders at the time.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,006
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Michael Moorer wasn't a bad fighter at all, he would have given Haye a fight but featherfisted? He was a good solid puncher, power in speed and combinations....he just fought stupidly vs Foreman.

    Moorer was a guy I wished fought other top contenders at the time.
    Moorer was really fighting well above his weight class. He was more effective as a LH.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Michael Moorer wasn't a bad fighter at all, he would have given Haye a fight but featherfisted? He was a good solid puncher, power in speed and combinations....he just fought stupidly vs Foreman.

    Moorer was a guy I wished fought other top contenders at the time.
    Moorer was really fighting well above his weight class. He was more effective as a LH.
    Moorer suffered with a not great chin.

    They are a funny old thing, chins.

    Some fighters can move up through the weights and take the best anyone has to offer.

    Some fighters chins improve as they go up. Cotto for instance. Cunningham is taking heavyweight shots better than he took cruiser weights.

    You have to wonder whether these fighters must be fighting well under a safe weight in the divisions they are in.

    Maybe there should be a new world belt called the natural weight belt where a fighters BMI or hydration is measured and there is a safe limit they are allowed to weigh in at.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,006
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Michael Moorer wasn't a bad fighter at all, he would have given Haye a fight but featherfisted? He was a good solid puncher, power in speed and combinations....he just fought stupidly vs Foreman.

    Moorer was a guy I wished fought other top contenders at the time.
    Moorer was really fighting well above his weight class. He was more effective as a LH.
    Moorer suffered with a not great chin.

    They are a funny old thing, chins.

    Some fighters can move up through the weights and take the best anyone has to offer.

    Some fighters chins improve as they go up. Cotto for instance. Cunningham is taking heavyweight shots better than he took cruiser weights.

    You have to wonder whether these fighters must be fighting well under a safe weight in the divisions they are in.

    Maybe there should be a new world belt called the natural weight belt where a fighters BMI or hydration is measured and there is a safe limit they are allowed to weigh in at.
    lolol....
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    BMI is an awful metric to use...

    Not so sure about Cunningham's chin either, think he's been on the canvas in something like 4 of his last 5 bouts?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    636
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Michael Moorer wasn't a bad fighter at all, he would have given Haye a fight but featherfisted? He was a good solid puncher, power in speed and combinations....he just fought stupidly vs Foreman.

    Moorer was a guy I wished fought other top contenders at the time.
    Moorer was really fighting well above his weight class. He was more effective as a LH.
    Moorer was a great puncher AT LHW..

    He was a HW featherfist.

    I don't think Moorer could have beaten many of the SHW punchers of the 90's, I think they would have ran through and flattened him.

    He was good against Foreman because he was so slow (until he got tagged) and against Holyfield who was a small HW and also not a big puncher at HW.

    Good fighter, but he'd never hang with Haye ever.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    981
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    I think David Haye at his best could beat Rahman and maybe Holyfield. Very few have his speed and power. People who say Tyson Fury could beat haye are falling for the Fury hype.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    636
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Haye overacheived as a heavyweight.
    I don't buy that for a second! He EASILY beat every other heavyweight he fought and if you're going to tell me "Well those were handpicked opponents" it doesn't much matter they (aside from Monte Barrett) were all still highly rated at the time. I don't know if Haye truly believed he belonged or if he just didn't have the heart to do it, but shit he was certainly skilled enough to be the #2 man in the division he just had to go out and work for it and for whatever reason he didn't.
    Haye would not have lasted had it been early 1990's. He would have stayed at cruiserweight.
    I don't buy that either. Heavyweights were smaller then and regardless he didn't fight in the 90's and sans time machine he wouldn't so it's a moot point.
    I am saying if he did fight during that time he would have stayed at the lower weight.
    Yet a slower, shitter, featherfisted boxer of even smaller proportions, far less athletic and skilled and possibly even chinnier (Moorer) DID make it. In fact he even became HW champ.

    David Haye would have been one of Lennox's better opponents and would have thrashed most of the 90's HW's beyond any doubt. He was an excellent boxer. How can you take that much away from him?

    True Moorer proved chinny- but thats because he had a bangers mentality. Far too many bangers in the 90's who would've pressed Haye into a fight. Haye can outrun a giant of Wlad & Valuev, but the 90's HW's could cut the ring off. Haye loses 2 outta every 4 fights vs U pickem.

    Lewis thrashes Haye.
    None of the other 90's boxers besides Lewis could move like Wladimir.

    Yeah I am sure guys like Rahman and Holyfield would make mincemeat of Haye like a better sparring session. You fool!

    We're talking about the HW with some of the fastest and sharpest performance in boxing the world has ever seen here. That's not licking Haye's ass either, that's just stating fact.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    689
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye- wasted talent?

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Haye overacheived as a heavyweight.
    I don't buy that for a second! He EASILY beat every other heavyweight he fought and if you're going to tell me "Well those were handpicked opponents" it doesn't much matter they (aside from Monte Barrett) were all still highly rated at the time. I don't know if Haye truly believed he belonged or if he just didn't have the heart to do it, but shit he was certainly skilled enough to be the #2 man in the division he just had to go out and work for it and for whatever reason he didn't.
    Haye would not have lasted had it been early 1990's. He would have stayed at cruiserweight.
    I don't buy that either. Heavyweights were smaller then and regardless he didn't fight in the 90's and sans time machine he wouldn't so it's a moot point.
    I am saying if he did fight during that time he would have stayed at the lower weight.
    Yet a slower, shitter, featherfisted boxer of even smaller proportions, far less athletic and skilled and possibly even chinnier (Moorer) DID make it. In fact he even became HW champ.

    David Haye would have been one of Lennox's better opponents and would have thrashed most of the 90's HW's beyond any doubt. He was an excellent boxer. How can you take that much away from him?

    True Moorer proved chinny- but thats because he had a bangers mentality. Far too many bangers in the 90's who would've pressed Haye into a fight. Haye can outrun a giant of Wlad & Valuev, but the 90's HW's could cut the ring off. Haye loses 2 outta every 4 fights vs U pickem.

    Lewis thrashes Haye.
    None of the other 90's boxers besides Lewis could move like Wladimir.
    Opinion, not fact, but hey; that's what you do, I guess.

    Yeah I am sure guys like Rahman and Holyfield would make mincemeat of Haye like a better sparring session. You fool!
    One day you should check out boxing--then you'd learn a few names besides Rahman & Holy. Oh, I forgot, you only post on HW's preferably your boner for Wlad, outside of that your history here shows that's all you post about. I guess 'cause that's all U know? & Just stop looking in the mirror as you type, then a fool won't come so easily to mind. Okay?

    We're talking about the HW with some of the fastest and sharpest performance in boxing the world has ever seen here. That's not licking Haye's ass either, that's just stating fact.
    Only you could use a pun like "licking ass" of a man. Max Power is back!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 109
    Last Post: 07-04-2014, 04:49 PM
  2. What's up with David Haye?
    By mrbig1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 02-27-2013, 05:20 PM
  3. Hatton and wasted talent
    By Greig in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-27-2012, 03:40 PM
  4. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-23-2012, 08:53 PM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-17-2006, 08:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing