Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2481
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Are you the dog from The Wizard Of Oz ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    924
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Are you the dog from The Wizard Of Oz ?
    Wow, he has one of the Nazis top generals as his avatar, that's ballsy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4177
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Are you the dog from The Wizard Of Oz ?
    Wow, he has one of the Nazis top generals as his avatar, that's ballsy
    Rommel was the only gentleman among them so Ive read, all other generals respected him greatly as did he respect them and all troops. He was all about the art of correct warfare nothing else.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,978
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1476
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    Once in awhile, get outside in fresh air, take a deep breath & with a deep sigh, let out all the things that's bottled up inside you & be free, & you'll get a glimpse of nirvana.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    924
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    Voice of reason from the Philippines, must be an enlightened country.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    545
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    553
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    Voice of reason from the Philippines, must be an enlightened country.
    That's not a voice of reason...that's a midget that doesn't know what he's talking about.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by corvette View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    Voice of reason from the Philippines, must be an enlightened country.
    That's not a voice of reason...that's a midget that doesn't know what he's talking about.
    Racist remarks! Not all Filipino are short, you ignorant monkey! If you were to be from a malnourished country for several generation. Let's see how tall and big your monkey ass gets.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    545
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    553
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    The intangibles also favor Mayweather.This fight is about who makes the most mistakes.

    Pac is just too damn sloppy to beat JMM,let alone Mayweather.
    He will pay dearly for his fly by night style.

    Tim Bradley tasted everything Manny had and still managed to put Pac on Elvis legs.

    It's hard enough for a tall fighter to land on Floyd,let alone a short guy with short arms ON ONE FOOT....like Manny.

    This will be a massacre and it will begin soon as Pac has to cover up..that's when Mayweather will be on those ribs like BBQ sauce.

    Pac squares up perfectly for that Mayweather JAB TO THE BODY...if the fight goes into the late rounds,when Pac tries to step on the gas,there will be nothing left in the tank.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,978
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1476
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by corvette View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    The intangibles also favor Mayweather.This fight is about who makes the most mistakes.

    Pac is just too damn sloppy to beat JMM,let alone Mayweather.
    He will pay dearly for his fly by night style.

    Tim Bradley tasted everything Manny had and still managed to put Pac on Elvis legs.

    It's hard enough for a tall fighter to land on Floyd,let alone a short guy with short arms ON ONE FOOT....like Manny.

    This will be a massacre and it will begin soon as Pac has to cover up..that's when Mayweather will be on those ribs like BBQ sauce.

    Pac squares up perfectly for that Mayweather JAB TO THE BODY...if the fight goes into the late rounds,when Pac tries to step on the gas,there will be nothing left in the tank.
    Alright, young lady, listen up. You're probably not aware of it but you're being the butt of sexist jokes and being gossiped about in one of the hidden boards here. You gotta post lot more of them nonsense of yours - 650 to be exact - so you can see for yourself what I mean. You don't believe me right? Well I'll give you a hint, this is my proof: does the word cyclone ring a bell to you?

    Quote Originally Posted by corvette View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    Voice of reason from the Philippines, must be an enlightened country.
    That's not a voice of reason...that's a midget that doesn't know what he's talking about.
    Now a midget? this is the first time I've been called that. Well, buddy, I prefer to be called a donkey to a midget coz that's what your li'l sister here calls me and she's lot more cute than you...

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by corvette View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    Voice of reason from the Philippines, must be an enlightened country.
    That's not a voice of reason...that's a midget that doesn't know what he's talking about.
    Racist remarks! Not all Filipino are short, you ignorant monkey! If you were to be from a malnourished country for several generation. Let's see how tall and big your monkey ass gets.
    My man Julius is right. I've grown up eating nothing but mangoes and sometimes grasses when mangoes ran out and that's why I ended up being 5 feet tall - oops, make that 4'11" I'm on a tiptoe but I could hardly reach the 5 foot line on the my height scale.
    Last edited by pacfan; 04-26-2015 at 07:44 AM.
    Once in awhile, get outside in fresh air, take a deep breath & with a deep sigh, let out all the things that's bottled up inside you & be free, & you'll get a glimpse of nirvana.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,499
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3116
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Stop all this racist nonsense lads otherwise the thread will be closed.

    Changed his avatar to another type of pussy.
    Last edited by Master; 04-26-2015 at 10:16 PM.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    3,795
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    How can Manny Pacquiao Lose ?

    Won't he pull in $100,000,000 {at a minimum}.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,499
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3116
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom View Post
    How can Manny Pacquiao Lose ?

    Won't he pull in $100,000,000 {at a minimum}.
    Money is not everything.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    46
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    Mayweather took not just one but two big shots from a prime Mosley and he didn't go down. He clinched well and got himself out of danger. After 4 rounds he figured Mosley out and dominated the rest of the match.

    As much as I love Pacquiao and want to see him win, I see this fight going the same way.

    Mayweather is the more complete fighter.

  14. #14
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Teddy Atlas has picked Manny Pacquiao.....sooo I'm guessing Floyd by SD/UD

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    37
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather: ANALYSIS

    Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
    Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
    @pacfan

    @Pac Fan,
    Hey man what Intangibles were you mouthing, you ain't know about boxing.
    PLEASE LOOK AT MY BRAGGING RIGHT, THE ONLY (WANNABE) BOXING ANALYST THAT DISPROVE VETERAN ANAL LIST , ER, ANALYSTS IN THE PHILIPPINES

    'I boldly predicted on media Pacquiao’s defeat to Mayweather

    By MORTZ C. ORTIGOZA

    Please bear with my Bragging Right's antics: Thanks to diligent research and meticulous observation on the strengths and weaknesses of the richest sportsman on earth Floyd Mayweather and Filipino boxing hero Manny Pacquiao, I did not only win against those gullible bettors, but against all odds including those boxing analysts in the Philippines, I fearlessly predicted on my TV and radio interviews and on my column Mayweather would defeat Pacquiao on their Flight, er Fight of the Century's match last May 3.http://****************************/...pacquiaos.html

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-13-2012, 06:55 PM
  2. Pacquiao – Mosley: Analysis
    By toto in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-05-2011, 10:37 AM
  3. Analysis: Pacquiao - Margarito
    By toto in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-13-2010, 10:27 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-13-2009, 08:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing