brock, eat a Snickers....you are a deranged whinging little twat when you're hungry
brock, eat a Snickers....you are a deranged whinging little twat when you're hungry
Wlad sucks? He won damn near every round of that fight. Jennings was attempting to use his feet and create some angles and it never....repeat.....NEVER paid off.
This shows Wlad is "slipping" or is "the worst ever"118-109, 116-111, 116-111 that's WITH a point deduction too....but keep complaining *yawn* dude is STILL champ and there's 0 you can do about it.
Last edited by El Kabong; 05-06-2015 at 10:43 PM.
I think Wlad has a wak chin and is the reason why he holds so much. He may also be slipping at his age and I think Wilder will present real problems for him now.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
That and I also think he does it to conserve energy and to tire out his opponents by leaning on them.
If a ref takes a hard approach to him and threatens to DQ him seriously, and he actually has to fight out of these situations, it's going to take it's toll on his stamina IMO. He's a huge guy, he's nearly 40 and all that muscle eats up a lot of oxygen.
David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King
YEEAAAAAAH, THAT's what started it
What was your intent of this thread Brockton(as well as the other thread)? Was it to inform, to educate, to incite?? Seems to me you're looking to incite and so there you have it....happy? If not then re-read some of YOUR posts and think about how others who might disagree would react to that.
If I call a fighter shit, I OWN that comment, I provide proof to back up my views, I don't whine about being attacked and being called names.....and yes I get called plenty of names.
I have a completely different perspective on that than you do. How others might "react" who might disagree? That's easy. They should disagree, ask for clarification, etc. But if they stoop so low as to personally say that you are a "deranged, drunken, whinging....etc..." then that is no longer part of the impersonal dialogue. It has then been made personal. Now i don't think YOU are Wladomir Klitschko, correct? So NO I don't share your view on how to respond to comments that one might disagree with. And good on you Lyle that you don't "whine about being attacked", good on you. I give you a pat on the back for that. But I would never be one of the ones who attack you, even if you wrote something utterly ridiculous and inciteful. So there's the difference between your perspective and mine. No matter what you write, I wouldnt stoop to call you a deranged whatever. Also if I see someone calling you names and deviating from the impersonal topic at hand, you know I would call them out on it, because in my eyes it would be wrong. Sure if you call me those names I will respond with the Tar Heel comment, etc. YOu weren't even IN the topic to begin with. And yes go ahead and guess like a mind readerthe hidden intentions as you implied of why I posted these Klit threads.
![]()
I wasn't in the topic but I'm on the forum, I can read, and when things I disagree with are posted I can comment on those things. The post about eating a Snickers was a JOKE, it was a joke about your complaining.....kind of the way the commercials for Snickers go...but whatever.
Tar Heel isn't insulting, it's what people from my state were called in battle for their unrelenting nature and reluctance to retreat and also for the industry of ship building as well as making/working with tar and pitch from tress.
I've not truly insulted you brock, so you know, take it easy big fella.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks