someone explain how a win over a guy who hadn't fought in nearly 2 years is a big deal plz? especially when the guy is as one dimensional as they come and had already been sparked by a feather fisted fighter in the 1st
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: How should a Canelo KO of Kirkland be viewed?
someone explain how a win over a guy who hadn't fought in nearly 2 years is a big deal plz? especially when the guy is as one dimensional as they come and had already been sparked by a feather fisted fighter in the 1st
Super Moderator
Array
Re: How should a Canelo KO of Kirkland be viewed?
Because they want to create another superstar and ppv fighter so that they can milk fans out of more money. The media hype and manufacturing by the TV companies of fighters to fill the gap Fraud Mayweather and Manny Pac is embarrassing.Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
someone explain how a win over a guy who hadn't fought in nearly 2 years is a big deal plz? especially when the guy is as one dimensional as they come and had already been sparked by a feather fisted fighter in the 1st
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: How should a Canelo KO of Kirkland be viewed?
my point exactly, this win was pointless and hollow, he should have just been rematching Lara who already beat Canelito in the first placeBecause they want to create another superstar and ppv fighter so that they can milk fans out of more money. The media hype and manufacturing by the TV companies of fighters to fill the gap Fraud Mayweather and Manny Pac is embarrassing.someone explain how a win over a guy who hadn't fought in nearly 2 years is a big deal plz? especially when the guy is as one dimensional as they come and had already been sparked by a feather fisted fighter in the 1st
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks