I like khan but dont want him to be the one to beat mayweather.
I dont want mayweather to loose but always held alittle flame for danny garcia to perhaps cause a shock but after his recent opposition he can go and do one.
I like khan but dont want him to be the one to beat mayweather.
I dont want mayweather to loose but always held alittle flame for danny garcia to perhaps cause a shock but after his recent opposition he can go and do one.
I do not want Khan to fight Floyd I would much prefer it was Thurman who is a strong punching hungry welterweight as he poses more of a risk to Mayweather.
Khan has played it smart and cautious to try and get the fight with Floyd and should he not get it then he will always have the Brooks fight anyway.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
The way I see it is it doesn't matter who Mayweather's Sept opponent is . If the fights in Vegas Floyd going to win. Well he'll get the decision whether he legally wins or not
After the shenannikins on May 2 even a blind man can see that. The corruption was blatant they didn't even try to cover it up. Morretti's 118-110 scorecard surely proved that.
It did for me. Floyd ran & held like a limpet he refused to engage Pac at all but won by 118-110?? No way in Hell. I'm one guy that will not be buying Mayweather farces never have never will
No I don't think he's earned his shot, but Thurman is fighting in July against Collazo and Brook is all but signed to fight Rios in August so you're running out of options.
Lucas Matthysse is with Golden Boy who are suing Al Haymon so that aint happening.
I think if Floyd is staying at Welter then it's Khan or Danny Garcia and Danny seems content to not fight at that level right now.
LOL Very funny You know we all make up our minds about fighters You guys can worship a cowardly woman beater like Mayweather who owes hsi bogus 0 to NSAC/Vegas corruption, all you want your choice. I prefer Fighters with champions cojones. something Mayweather lacks. Cowards can never be TBE or ATG's hence Fraud fails both
No.
Reason: because. That's it.
All's lost! Everything's going to shit!
I do yes.
Floyds a boring ass fighter and Khan is exciting as shit.
I know Floyds talents but it annoys me how shit a fighter he is.
By fighter I mean actually fighting, big combos, goin for blood, knockouts and all the rest.
Based on pure guts and exceitement Khan is much more fan friendly than Floyd.
You say tomato,
‘n I say …… it correctly.
Crawford. Khan will get knocked out, his ego can't get him this fight. Khan will get starched.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Yeah, because as an event, it will be decent. I don't think he comes close to winning, but he could pose problems for Mayweather in some way or another. I don't see anybody else making a Mayweather fight competitive anyway. Thurman is probably the most dangerous, but he hasn't really had the exposure to generate massive money in a Mayweather fight. After that, he's beaten Cotto, Alvarez, Pacquiao, Marquez and Maidana, who are all the closest ranked fighters to him in both of his ruling divisions.
So that leaves...
Thurman
Brook
Bradley
Porter
Broner
Khan
Andrade
Lara
So you can eliminate Lara and Andrade from the picture. They're in the 'who needs them' club. Broner is his buddy so he's gone. Porter needs a strong win. So does Bradley. Thurman and Brook probably need another 12 months of exposure. He's already beaten Cotto, Canelo (who look like they will fight eachother anyway) Marquez, Pacquiao and Maidana. Khan is the most logical option for him. He's probably the most vulnerable opponent as well as being one of the most lucrative.
He's been around long enough. His win over Alexander was exceptional. He wasn't great against Algieri, but perhaps we under-rated him based on what Pacquiao did to him. He did beat the Provodnikov who is decent enough (ask Bradley).
So based on that, i'd say he's as deserving as anyone really.
http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks