world war two

[walrus]

I went to Berlin this past October and doing the tours around the war areas was really quite sad. Berlin really got torn the fuck up, you forget it wasn't just a country full of evil Nazis, most of the victims like usual were just normal everyday people. As we were in certain areas the guide would talk about what the area used to be like before the war.

Well observed. I always try to look at the other side in politics as you know that you are only going to get one side. Churchill was a war criminal psychopath and people should know that. It doesn't matter how it is spun, but he ordered the destruction of hundreds of thousands of innocent people and starved to death 4 million Indians amongst many other things. You add up the numbers and he was an english speaking Hitler minus the moustache. 'Blasphemy' they cry as they build the new reich themselves.

miles are you drinking again

[Gandalf]

I went to Berlin this past October and doing the tours around the war areas was really quite sad. Berlin really got torn the fuck up, you forget it wasn't just a country full of evil Nazis, most of the victims like usual were just normal everyday people. As we were in certain areas the guide would talk about what the area used to be like before the war.

Well observed. I always try to look at the other side in politics as you know that you are only going to get one side. Churchill was a war criminal psychopath and people should know that. It doesn't matter how it is spun, but he ordered the destruction of hundreds of thousands of innocent people and starved to death 4 million Indians amongst many other things. You add up the numbers and he was an english speaking Hitler minus the moustache. 'Blasphemy' they cry as they build the new reich themselves.

miles are you drinking again

Nope, I just will not be conditioned. Churchill was involved in far more than mass starvation and routine slaughter. A sinister man indeed.

[beenKOed]

@Kirkland Laing how did that work for the many that lost their homes during the bombings. Did the government help these people rebuild or did they have to do it themselves, I imagine hundreds of thousands to millions lost their homes. The Brits showed tremendous resolve during those times. Although the US was helping with the lend lease act, I think that was the name of it, but I think we took too long to join the war, but public sentiment was against involvement.

If it wasn't for that US aid the Brits would of gone out like the French

Don't like beating the patriotic drum unduly but I can assure you that Britain would have never surrendered.

Honestly, wouldn't expect you to say anything else, but the Nazis were absolutely merciless and would have done anything necessary. Germany was under the control of a madman who had no limits.
Thankfully, the rest of the world finally got off their backsides and helped deal with them/it.

[walrus]

After the battle of Britain Germany couldn't have taken England but Hitler also had political reasons for giving up on England. He actually thought England would join him in attacking the ussr

[mrbig1]

After the battle of Britain Germany couldn't have taken England but Hitler also had political reasons for giving up on England. He actually thought England would join him in attacking the ussr

that's hard to believe since Churchill was under Jewish control.

[walrus]

After the battle of Britain Germany couldn't have taken England but Hitler also had political reasons for giving up on England. He actually thought England would join him in attacking the ussr

that's hard to believe since Churchill was under Jewish control.

I'm sorry Mr big but could you clarify that for me.

[mrbig1]

After the battle of Britain Germany couldn't have taken England but Hitler also had political reasons for giving up on England. He actually thought England would join him in attacking the ussr

that's hard to believe since Churchill was under Jewish control.

I'm sorry Mr big but could you clarify that for me.

Here it is.

[Beanz]

I went to Berlin this past October and doing the tours around the war areas was really quite sad. Berlin really got torn the fuck up, you forget it wasn't just a country full of evil Nazis, most of the victims like usual were just normal everyday people. As we were in certain areas the guide would talk about what the area used to be like before the war.

Well observed. I always try to look at the other side in politics as you know that you are only going to get one side. Churchill was a war criminal psychopath and people should know that. It doesn't matter how it is spun, but he ordered the destruction of hundreds of thousands of innocent people and starved to death 4 million Indians amongst many other things. You add up the numbers and he was an english speaking Hitler minus the moustache. 'Blasphemy' they cry as they build the new reich themselves.

miles are you drinking again

Nope, I just will not be conditioned. Churchill was involved in far more than mass starvation and routine slaughter. A sinister man indeed.

The thing is you come across as hugely conditioned. You have a complex in which everyone but you is stupid , naive and easily manipulated but the truth is that the so called truth that you are just stumbling upon has been paraded by conspiracy theorists for years. Overwhelming evidence does not make something unlikely to have happened and yet you have to swallow such an idea to even begin believing much of what you pro port to be true.

[Beanz]

After the battle of Britain Germany couldn't have taken England but Hitler also had political reasons for giving up on England. He actually thought England would join him in attacking the ussr

that's hard to believe since Churchill was under Jewish control.

I'm sorry Mr big but could you clarify that for me.

Here it is.

David Irving is a holocaust denier whose credence has been shot to pieces. To believe such nonsense then you must not only disregard the eyewitness testimony of living survivors but also the evidence of hundreds of historians, liberators, victims and perpetrators. Film,photographs, documentation, personal belongings piled high and the weight of reality is not so easy to shrug off.

If he could not understand the difference between Zionist and Jew then how can he expect the rest of the world to pay attention to such poisonous lies ? A deluded man's ranting is not any kind of evidence whatsoever.

[walrus]

I don't know, I started to listen to the video posted above but the guy has such obvious contempt for Jews it just turned me off. England should have just told the poles and Jews you have a problem, deal with it, I don't think it would have played out to well for history.

[Gandalf]

I went to Berlin this past October and doing the tours around the war areas was really quite sad. Berlin really got torn the fuck up, you forget it wasn't just a country full of evil Nazis, most of the victims like usual were just normal everyday people. As we were in certain areas the guide would talk about what the area used to be like before the war.

Well observed. I always try to look at the other side in politics as you know that you are only going to get one side. Churchill was a war criminal psychopath and people should know that. It doesn't matter how it is spun, but he ordered the destruction of hundreds of thousands of innocent people and starved to death 4 million Indians amongst many other things. You add up the numbers and he was an english speaking Hitler minus the moustache. 'Blasphemy' they cry as they build the new reich themselves.

miles are you drinking again

Nope, I just will not be conditioned. Churchill was involved in far more than mass starvation and routine slaughter. A sinister man indeed.

The thing is you come across as hugely conditioned. You have a complex in which everyone but you is stupid , naive and easily manipulated but the truth is that the so called truth that you are just stumbling upon has been paraded by conspiracy theorists for years. Overwhelming evidence does not make something unlikely to have happened and yet you have to swallow such an idea to even begin believing much of what you pro port to be true.

You think Churchill was a hero. I equate him with any other genocidal maniac. On the whole it is me that is introducing a little perspective. Ive been ranting on the same station for years. Admittedly, I am not writing any of this history myself. I see both sides, dude.

[Gandalf]

As far as historians go David Irving is controversial and like any historian he has his agenda. However, it is easy to trot out 'holocaust denier' whenever anyone questions the narrative of the holocaust. The numbers vary widely for even Iraq war fatalities, yet the Nazi genocide is somehow untouchable. Labels to degrade and avoid debate.

[walrus]

As far as historians go David Irving is controversial and like any historian he has his agenda. However, it is easy to trot out 'holocaust denier' whenever anyone questions the narrative of the holocaust. The numbers vary widely for even Iraq war fatalities, yet the Nazi genocide is somehow untouchable. Labels to degrade and avoid debate.

The Nazis kept impeccable records to there own detriment. I don't see what the issue is. Not saying they were worse than any other genocidal regime but the way they went about things was so methodical and industrial it is quite chilling.

[Beanz]

I went to Berlin this past October and doing the tours around the war areas was really quite sad. Berlin really got torn the fuck up, you forget it wasn't just a country full of evil Nazis, most of the victims like usual were just normal everyday people. As we were in certain areas the guide would talk about what the area used to be like before the war.

Well observed. I always try to look at the other side in politics as you know that you are only going to get one side. Churchill was a war criminal psychopath and people should know that. It doesn't matter how it is spun, but he ordered the destruction of hundreds of thousands of innocent people and starved to death 4 million Indians amongst many other things. You add up the numbers and he was an english speaking Hitler minus the moustache. 'Blasphemy' they cry as they build the new reich themselves.

miles are you drinking again

Nope, I just will not be conditioned. Churchill was involved in far more than mass starvation and routine slaughter. A sinister man indeed.

The thing is you come across as hugely conditioned. You have a complex in which everyone but you is stupid , naive and easily manipulated but the truth is that the so called truth that you are just stumbling upon has been paraded by conspiracy theorists for years. Overwhelming evidence does not make something unlikely to have happened and yet you have to swallow such an idea to even begin believing much of what you pro port to be true.

You think Churchill was a hero. I equate him with any other genocidal maniac. On the whole it is me that is introducing a little perspective. Ive been ranting on the same station for years. Admittedly, I am not writing any of this history myself. I see both sides, dude.

I never called Churchill a hero. Your argument is so weak that you have to invent an opposite position to give your own rubbish any credence. You yourself claimed that "everything was too easy, you just have to connect the dots", that does not lend veracity to your claims it undermines them. I have never claimed people are too ignorant and stupid to see the truth but you have to in order to once again make your ludicrous assertions hold any water. You have to remove history, credibility and all received wisdom to even begin to explain what you are suggesting is true.

[Beanz]

As far as historians go David Irving is controversial and like any historian he has his agenda. However, it is easy to trot out 'holocaust denier' whenever anyone questions the narrative of the holocaust. The numbers vary widely for even Iraq war fatalities, yet the Nazi genocide is somehow untouchable. Labels to degrade and avoid debate.

Do you not think Holocaust denial itself is a degrading escapade? Nobody is avoiding debate, but to debate something you must start from a common ground of sensible ideas and yet you are suggesting that we all ignore history and start from your side of the fence with all the ignorami like Icke, Irving et al. Stawman argument Miles. There is a hole in your bucket 10 feet wide.