Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Is Errol Spence "special"??

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1350
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    He looks a boss to me, nice to see a good southpaw that stands their ground like that. The guy seems very aware and patient, mean body attack, accurate and nice variety with a nasty uppercut, I like him. It didn't seem like the Italian guy he fought came with anything much though, so he clearly needs a test . Who are likely opponents for him? A few guys like Guerrero, Berto, Ortiz etc would be great, or Collazo if Thurman wasn't fighting him. He is with Golden boy right? Not sure if that hurts him getting matched up with Haymon guys or not these days. He and Crawford could be a superfight in a couple of years....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,079
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    838
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    He looks a boss to me, nice to see a good southpaw that stands their ground like that. The guy seems very aware and patient, mean body attack, accurate and nice variety with a nasty uppercut, I like him. It didn't seem like the Italian guy he fought came with anything much though, so he clearly needs a test . Who are likely opponents for him? A few guys like Guerrero, Berto, Ortiz etc would be great, or Collazo if Thurman wasn't fighting him. He is with Golden boy right? Not sure if that hurts him getting matched up with Haymon guys or not these days. He and Crawford could be a superfight in a couple of years....
    A Spence/Crawford fight would be something to see. But I am waiting patiently on a Crawford/Garcia fight, quite frankly.

    Thurman says he would take the fight. But Thurman should be chasing top guys now. Plus, Thurman can knock him out, more so than anyone in the division. Not sure Spence is really for that just yet.

    Ortiz, Berto, Guerrero or Soto-Karass would do well right about now.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    707
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    He looks a boss to me, nice to see a good southpaw that stands their ground like that. The guy seems very aware and patient, mean body attack, accurate and nice variety with a nasty uppercut, I like him. It didn't seem like the Italian guy he fought came with anything much though, so he clearly needs a test . Who are likely opponents for him? A few guys like Guerrero, Berto, Ortiz etc would be great, or Collazo if Thurman wasn't fighting him. He is with Golden boy right? Not sure if that hurts him getting matched up with Haymon guys or not these days. He and Crawford could be a superfight in a couple of years....
    A Spence/Crawford fight would be something to see. But I am waiting patiently on a Crawford/Garcia fight, quite frankly.

    Thurman says he would take the fight. But Thurman should be chasing top guys now. Plus, Thurman can knock him out, more so than anyone in the division. Not sure Spence is really for that just yet.

    Ortiz, Berto, Guerrero or Soto-Karass would do well right about now.
    Where did you see Thurman say he would take the fight? I ask because I've read repeatedly that Thurman isn't interested. Spence wants Thurman or Porter September 12th for a title. Neither seems interested from what I've read.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3139
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    Looks the business so far. "Special" is pushing it a bit

    I saw an interview last week with Thurman - he said he'd be happy to knock the boy out but he has a lot to prove before he's at his level. Which is fair enough.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3139
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    The fella he beat up the other night had never been stopped before had he? Bin in with porter too

    Good form in itself innit

    Or am I thinking of the wrong geezer?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    707
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Looks the business so far. "Special" is pushing it a bit

    I saw an interview last week with Thurman - he said he'd be happy to knock the boy out but he has a lot to prove before he's at his level. Which is fair enough.
    That's a no. He might very well KO Spence but Thurman hasn't done much more than Spence, Thurman has been managed very carefully. Difference is Spence is eager to step up, Thurman is looking for a payday. Thurman should be happy to fight Spence for a title, he should be calling for Brook, these are the show me fights. But he talks about Pac and Floyd(paydays) while fighting frickin Collazo. He's no different than Khan, a talent that won't earn his shot.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Looks the business so far. "Special" is pushing it a bit

    I saw an interview last week with Thurman - he said he'd be happy to knock the boy out but he has a lot to prove before he's at his level. Which is fair enough.
    That's a no. He might very well KO Spence but Thurman hasn't done much more than Spence, Thurman has been managed very carefully. Difference is Spence is eager to step up, Thurman is looking for a payday. Thurman should be happy to fight Spence for a title, he should be calling for Brook, these are the show me fights. But he talks about Pac and Floyd(paydays) while fighting frickin Collazo. He's no different than Khan, a talent that won't earn his shot.
    what does khan have to do to "earn a shot"?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    707
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Looks the business so far. "Special" is pushing it a bit

    I saw an interview last week with Thurman - he said he'd be happy to knock the boy out but he has a lot to prove before he's at his level. Which is fair enough.
    That's a no. He might very well KO Spence but Thurman hasn't done much more than Spence, Thurman has been managed very carefully. Difference is Spence is eager to step up, Thurman is looking for a payday. Thurman should be happy to fight Spence for a title, he should be calling for Brook, these are the show me fights. But he talks about Pac and Floyd(paydays) while fighting frickin Collazo. He's no different than Khan, a talent that won't earn his shot.
    what does khan have to do to "earn a shot"?
    He could have fought Brook. Same thing Thurman should be looking to do. Anyone fighting good opponents would be a huge improvement over what is going on in the sport now. Instead of top guys fighting top guys Collazo gets them all, there is something seriously wrong with that. Every fight can't marinate, some just need to be made, some people need to put up or shut up.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3139
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Looks the business so far. "Special" is pushing it a bit

    I saw an interview last week with Thurman - he said he'd be happy to knock the boy out but he has a lot to prove before he's at his level. Which is fair enough.
    That's a no. He might very well KO Spence but Thurman hasn't done much more than Spence, Thurman has been managed very carefully. Difference is Spence is eager to step up, Thurman is looking for a payday. Thurman should be happy to fight Spence for a title, he should be calling for Brook, these are the show me fights. But he talks about Pac and Floyd(paydays) while fighting frickin Collazo. He's no different than Khan, a talent that won't earn his shot.
    Thurman is doing nothing different to everyone else. It's a food chain.

    Floyd wont fight Thurman because he can make the same money against less dangerous fighters. Thurman wont fight Spence because he can currently make the same/more money against bigger names in the division.

    Just because Floyd wants his boy to get fast tracked up the ladder it doesn't mean guys like Thurman are going to bend over and say go right ahead.

    These guys are all with Haymon anyway, if they wanted to make the fights they would.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    707
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Looks the business so far. "Special" is pushing it a bit

    I saw an interview last week with Thurman - he said he'd be happy to knock the boy out but he has a lot to prove before he's at his level. Which is fair enough.
    That's a no. He might very well KO Spence but Thurman hasn't done much more than Spence, Thurman has been managed very carefully. Difference is Spence is eager to step up, Thurman is looking for a payday. Thurman should be happy to fight Spence for a title, he should be calling for Brook, these are the show me fights. But he talks about Pac and Floyd(paydays) while fighting frickin Collazo. He's no different than Khan, a talent that won't earn his shot.
    Thurman is doing nothing different to everyone else. It's a food chain.

    Floyd wont fight Thurman because he can make the same money against less dangerous fighters. Thurman wont fight Spence because he can currently make the same/more money against bigger names in the division.

    Just because Floyd wants his boy to get fast tracked up the ladder it doesn't mean guys like Thurman are going to bend over and say go right ahead.

    These guys are all with Haymon anyway, if they wanted to make the fights they would.
    Big names? Like Collazo? Collazo wasn't that good at his best. A title shot is a title shot. And F names! People should fight talented fighters not names.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,079
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    838
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Looks the business so far. "Special" is pushing it a bit

    I saw an interview last week with Thurman - he said he'd be happy to knock the boy out but he has a lot to prove before he's at his level. Which is fair enough.
    That's a no. He might very well KO Spence but Thurman hasn't done much more than Spence, Thurman has been managed very carefully. Difference is Spence is eager to step up, Thurman is looking for a payday. Thurman should be happy to fight Spence for a title, he should be calling for Brook, these are the show me fights. But he talks about Pac and Floyd(paydays) while fighting frickin Collazo. He's no different than Khan, a talent that won't earn his shot.
    Thurman has been ducked quite carefully. For some strange reason, he is having the GGG effect. Guys just don't want to jump into fight him for pennies to the dollar. High risk vs. low reward.

    Thurman should just keep fighting top 10 guys and hold his title. Sooner or later, someone has to fight him. And most likely it won't be this year, so next year he will have a big name scalp.

    I think JMM (if not too old by then), Manny, Bradley or Brook would take a fight with him by next year. Just continue to hold the belt until that time.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    He looks good but it is too early to say.

    I dont think he is super special.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,079
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    838
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Errol Spence "special"??

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    He looks a boss to me, nice to see a good southpaw that stands their ground like that. The guy seems very aware and patient, mean body attack, accurate and nice variety with a nasty uppercut, I like him. It didn't seem like the Italian guy he fought came with anything much though, so he clearly needs a test . Who are likely opponents for him? A few guys like Guerrero, Berto, Ortiz etc would be great, or Collazo if Thurman wasn't fighting him. He is with Golden boy right? Not sure if that hurts him getting matched up with Haymon guys or not these days. He and Crawford could be a superfight in a couple of years....
    A Spence/Crawford fight would be something to see. But I am waiting patiently on a Crawford/Garcia fight, quite frankly.

    Thurman says he would take the fight. But Thurman should be chasing top guys now. Plus, Thurman can knock him out, more so than anyone in the division. Not sure Spence is really for that just yet.

    Ortiz, Berto, Guerrero or Soto-Karass would do well right about now.
    Where did you see Thurman say he would take the fight? I ask because I've read repeatedly that Thurman isn't interested. Spence wants Thurman or Porter September 12th for a title. Neither seems interested from what I've read.
    I was wrong with that, it was the other way around- Spence was the one that wants the Thurman fight. I think he may be trying to bite off more than he can chew.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 02:09 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 09:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing