Do People still have Bradley in their top ten p4p?

[Beanflicker]

Bradley's a great talent. If he could stay focused and not over exchange then he'd look a lot better.

I thought he fought masterfully against JMM, and deserved the decision 100%.

The guy is tough as nails and always seems to find a way to win.

[Master]

Brooks beat Bradley as does Thurman. He is lucky to be in the Top Rank camp because it is protecting him against the best fighters.

[mikeeod]

Bradley reminds me of Holyfield to a certain degree. He tends to fight down to his level of competition at times, but is capable of producing excellent displays of skill and discipline when he needs/wants to. I view him as a better/more polished/more athletic version of Danny Garcia, able to figure out the other guys weakness and exploit it for the ugly/close win.

I would put Bardley in my top 12, not sure he makes my top 10 at this point. I am sure I will be in the minority, but I personally would keep Khan, Brook and Thurman away from him at this point. All of those guys are solid fighters for the most part, but I just see Tim exposing Khans frailness/lack of durability and Brooks/Thurmans lack of experience. Brook has the best shot to beat him, in my opinion, but it would be an EXTREMELY dangerous assignment at this point in his career.

[Beanflicker]

I fear that Bradley has become more of a Meldrick Taylor, choosing to brawl it out and make his fights a lot harder than they should be.

He desperately wants to be a KO artist, but it's just not in the cards for him and he needs to accept the fact that he will be relying on the judge's scorecards in the vast majority of his fights. He's a border collie trying to be a pit bull. He needs to cut that shit out.

[Spicoli]

For me I never saw Bradley as p4p fighter. The majority of the time while enthused and all efforting, fans are yelling what bad judgment he has and one track mind on being something he's not. I actually thought Vargas again showed many holes on Tim late who outside of Marquez fighting like a inside trap slugger, does not deal with handspeed and counters well or look or act p4p. He's one where you block the top portion of the screen and just watch the feet live. He literally walks into counters on his toes.

[Vendettos]

He was never in my top 10.

[erics44]

He was never in my top 10.

you must have one controvertial top 10

[erics44]

Brooks beat Bradley as does Thurman. He is lucky to be in the Top Rank camp because it is protecting him against the best fighters.

its brook not brooks

[SlimTrae]

Bradley's a great talent. If he could stay focused and not over exchange then he'd look a lot better.

I thought he fought masterfully against JMM, and deserved the decision 100%.

The guy is tough as nails and always seems to find a way to win.

I agree with you All day long.

His victories come in different ways for sure. from Kendal Holt, to Provodnikov, to JMM, he has more than one way to win a fight.

Top 10 for me.

[Primo Carnera]

I think he is top 10, but one thing's for sure, he is definitely top 10 watchable fighters!
I think he's a great boxer, but also pretty stupid or brave or both! I agree with Slim Trae, against JMM he was superb, and then you see the way he fought Provodnikov - absolutely fuckin nuts!
Then he talks about GGG, and "if Klitschko wants a dance partner!" If only every boxer and every promoter had his mindset.
A credit to the sport IMO .