Does it scare Americans that Trump is in second place?

[El Kabong]

There will be great focus on vetting Republican candidates. Pundits will talk about Democrat candidates, but will they ask them anything of substance? Will they expect answers for lingering questions?

Signs point to "No"


When Hillary is asked what her favorite ice cream flavor is and not much is made over her emails which show she obviously is not the smartest woman in the world and was out of her depth as Secretary of State, but totally capable of raking in the cash of course.

[SlimTrae]

There will be great focus on vetting Republican candidates. Pundits will talk about Democrat candidates, but will they ask them anything of substance?

Same stuff they ask Repubs they will ask Dems.

Will they expect answers for lingering questions?
Will FOX op-ed turned so-called news do the same? Talk radio like Rush Limbaugh to Laura Ingram or whatever her name is- will they vet the people they continuously denounce, pounce and trounce on? Or will they continue to call moderate Republican, to a Democratic liberal--- everything negative without an invite...an invite on their show(s) to defend their views. Signs point to the same -
no they wont.

Signs point to "No"


When Hillary is asked what her favorite ice cream flavor is and not much is made over her emails
You mean like the same emails lost during the Republican rule where the RNC stated they lost millions of emails- and the servers that backed them up crashed? Find a Conservative commentator that raised those questions. If so, you got a legitimate point. If you cant find a conservative news outlet that questions the Republican in the same fashion, then it will be the same for Democratic outlets. They have both lost a gazillion emails. I am one to point out both: not one.

So Walker and Rubio are asked: So...whose more conservative? Like they did in 2008 elections, I can provide the links if need...will those questions get to the heart of what will make them a true leader? Both sides throw softball questions to their own team, then go curve ball on the other side. I can point it out on both sides: not just one.

which show she obviously is not the smartest woman in the world and was out of her depth as Secretary of State, but totally capable of raking in the cash of course.

Since Bush Jr---- smarts was no longer a criteria for being POTUS.
So no, she doesn't have to be the smartest woman to win.

All she has to do -is sit back and watch Republicans do what Governor Huckabee pointed out in 2008 & 2012 "We cant be the party of no and expect to win. We cant continue to try winning elections by claiming what Democrats are doing wrong. We have to point out what we can do right."

[walrus]

You know who I would really like to see run is Condi Rice. I really thought she had a great head on her shoulders. She always impressed me in interviews, I actually wouldn't mind having carnal knowledge with or of her. I think there is a pretty good chance she is a lesbian. I don't know how the media would treat that hot potato. And slim, ever since Andrew Jackson you didn't need to be smart to be President.

[brocktonblockbust]

You know who I would really like to see run is Condi Rice. I really thought she had a great head on her shoulders. She always impressed me in interviews, I actually wouldn't mind having carnal knowledge with or of her. I think there is a pretty good chance she is a lesbian. I don't know how the media would treat that hot potato. And slim, ever since Andrew Jackson you didn't need to be smart to be President.

nice legs she got