Does it scare Americans that Trump is in second place?

[frozensolid-702]

Anyone know what the q in lgbtq means. I was going to Google it but I became afraid.

Here in the US in many companies we have to take ethnic diversity/sensitivity training. They are quite comical. One of my jobs is for a very large company so they seem to constantly be running a seminar but we did have a couple of very intense lesbians explain that there belief was that they were superior to heterosexuals as they had evolved past relationships needing to include procreation. Apparently they belong to a rainbow coalition that preaches this stuff. Some people were shocked, some were offended but I rather enjoyed the confusion in out fortune 500 ethnic diversity training room.

Queer and Questioning are the 2. If you're both, it would be LGBTQQ, but the fun doesn't stop there.....
Brace yourself for LGBTTIQQ2SA

https://activevoicepress.wordpress.com/tag/lgbtqqiaap/

This one actually hails from the good ol' US of A. This movement has gained considerable traction as of late, and rest assured it will EXPLODE if/when Hillary is elected.

I want off this ride......

[Gandalf]

The gay movement thing is out of control. On the news here they mentioned a trial run for a gay marriage and I was like 'What on earth is this? Why?' They are actively trying to condition society even though there is literally no demand for such a change. It's like the EU immigration issue, people were not given a choice and it leads to turmoil and conflict. I predict the same thing will result from the obsession with gayness.

[frozensolid-702]

The gay movement thing is out of control. On the news here they mentioned a trial run for a gay marriage and I was like 'What on earth is this? Why?' They are actively trying to condition society even though there is literally no demand for such a change. It's like the EU immigration issue, people were not given a choice and it leads to turmoil and conflict. I predict the same thing will result from the obsession with gayness.

I really don't understand it, to be honest. I'm not anti-gay because it's not really my business if guys like dudes putting penises in their butts, but for the love of God stop celebrating homosexuality like it's on the level of slaves being freed.
Not sure how bad it is for the average Joe across the pond, but my Facebook feed is literally slammed with parents sending their 7 year old sons to school in dresses, and calling it "Parenting done right," because they let their kids wear whatever they want, so they could be free of oppression and able to choose their gender.
WTF? All that shit is, is a complete and total lack of rules and family values.
if you're gay, then good for you but stop trying to make everybody else gay.

[Gandalf]

The gay movement thing is out of control. On the news here they mentioned a trial run for a gay marriage and I was like 'What on earth is this? Why?' They are actively trying to condition society even though there is literally no demand for such a change. It's like the EU immigration issue, people were not given a choice and it leads to turmoil and conflict. I predict the same thing will result from the obsession with gayness.

I really don't understand it, to be honest. I'm not anti-gay because it's not really my business if guys like dudes putting penises in their butts, but for the love of God stop celebrating homosexuality like it's on the level of slaves being freed.
Not sure how bad it is for the average Joe across the pond, but my Facebook feed is literally slammed with parents sending their 7 year old sons to school in dresses, and calling it "Parenting done right," because they let their kids wear whatever they want, so they could be free of oppression and able to choose their gender.
WTF? All that shit is, is a complete and total lack of rules and family values.
if you're gay, then good for you but stop trying to make everybody else gay.

Very well said.

I agree with you. I am comfortable around gay people, I admire several gay writers and artists, but I draw the line at turning the world gay. It is almost as though after subverting the traditional family with feminism, they have decided to finish the experiment with gay marriage etc. Society should be based on families with 2 parents and a government by and for the people supporting that solid foundation. Instead what we have are broken families, politics for globalists and homosexuality. The decadence seemingly has no limit and typically comes right before a society devours itself. Enough is enough. I'm cool with you being gay, but do not promote it. That is where a country like Russia has a lot more sense.

[frozensolid-702]

The gay movement thing is out of control. On the news here they mentioned a trial run for a gay marriage and I was like 'What on earth is this? Why?' They are actively trying to condition society even though there is literally no demand for such a change. It's like the EU immigration issue, people were not given a choice and it leads to turmoil and conflict. I predict the same thing will result from the obsession with gayness.

I really don't understand it, to be honest. I'm not anti-gay because it's not really my business if guys like dudes putting penises in their butts, but for the love of God stop celebrating homosexuality like it's on the level of slaves being freed.
Not sure how bad it is for the average Joe across the pond, but my Facebook feed is literally slammed with parents sending their 7 year old sons to school in dresses, and calling it "Parenting done right," because they let their kids wear whatever they want, so they could be free of oppression and able to choose their gender.
WTF? All that shit is, is a complete and total lack of rules and family values.
if you're gay, then good for you but stop trying to make everybody else gay.

after subverting the traditional family with feminism, they have decided to finish the experiment with gay marriage etc.

Good sir, you have nailed it.
There is a direct correlation in regards to the rise of this new wave of advanced (extremist) feminism, splattering the globe with homosexual propaganda, AND celebrating the fall of traditional, fundamentally based family values.

I have very few questions left in the tank after much research (red-pilling, if you will) but the most important one remains....

Why?

[Gandalf]

That is a good question. I think when you look at how systems of power operate there is often a duality. For instance, they claim to be fighting terrorism yet are actively funding and supporting terrorist groups. They twist language so that even dissent becomes terrorism, yet government creates terrorism! I think in a similar way, feminism came about in the guise of women's liberation, which of course, to some extent it was, but it also got women into work so that corporations could further reduce wages and children became wards of the state. With sexuality you see the guise of equal rights, but where is the push coming from exactly? Even back in the 1970's Labour politicians were promoting lowering the age of consent, basically legalising paedophilia. My own view, and people will disagree, is that it is all about subverting moral norms and conditioning people to accept and tolerate things such as the lowering of the age of consent later on. There are deviant people in positions of power that want their behaviour to be seen as less deviant now that it is becoming common knowledge what they have been up to. Once you accept gay marriage and gays adopting etc, then you know you are at the stage where almost anything is permitted. Then these people have no reason to fear the law or act in fear. It is good that people want to share their lives together, but I think the rush to get this all passed, is intentional and has ulterior motives. Society functioned better when government was more for people and family instead of corporations and broken families. That much is fairly obvious. We should be very careful as we know what works but do the opposite with the financial systems, morality, wars, destruction of the family etc.

[brocktonblockbust]

A MAN is a hard thing, a hard cock, a take-charge guy, responsible, does his job hard, dedicated, is masculine, a MAN is HARD, a man is tough, a man wants to fuck women.

FUCK, THEY MUST BE PUTTING HORMONES IN THE FOOD & DRINK SINCE THE 60s........ this shit is EXPLODING!!!!

[brocktonblockbust]

That is a good question. I think when you look at how systems of power operate there is often a duality. For instance, they claim to be fighting terrorism yet are actively funding and supporting terrorist groups. They twist language so that even dissent becomes terrorism, yet government creates terrorism! I think in a similar way, feminism came about in the guise of women's liberation, which of course, to some extent it was, but it also got women into work so that corporations could further reduce wages and children became wards of the state. With sexuality you see the guise of equal rights, but where is the push coming from exactly? Even back in the 1970's Labour politicians were promoting lowering the age of consent, basically legalising paedophilia. My own view, and people will disagree, is that it is all about subverting moral norms and conditioning people to accept and tolerate things such as the lowering of the age of consent later on. There are deviant people in positions of power that want their behaviour to be seen as less deviant now that it is becoming common knowledge what they have been up to. Once you accept gay marriage and gays adopting etc, then you know you are at the stage where almost anything is permitted. Then these people have no reason to fear the law or act in fear. It is good that people want to share their lives together, but I think the rush to get this all passed, is intentional and has ulterior motives. Society functioned better when government was more for people and family instead of corporations and broken families. That much is fairly obvious. We should be very careful as we know what works but do the opposite with the financial systems, morality, wars, destruction of the family etc.

Gandalf consistently gets it right. Not only do they call it terrorism if you dissent, they call it POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS if you dont go along with the BLH far-left agenda on using words like "gay", "black", etc...

THAT is the terrorism, people are scared to use certain words now, or they will be "shamed" on Twitter and Facebook for example.

[Beanz]

That is a good question. I think when you look at how systems of power operate there is often a duality. For instance, they claim to be fighting terrorism yet are actively funding and supporting terrorist groups. They twist language so that even dissent becomes terrorism, yet government creates terrorism! I think in a similar way, feminism came about in the guise of women's liberation, which of course, to some extent it was, but it also got women into work so that corporations could further reduce wages and children became wards of the state. With sexuality you see the guise of equal rights, but where is the push coming from exactly? Even back in the 1970's Labour politicians were promoting lowering the age of consent, basically legalising paedophilia. My own view, and people will disagree, is that it is all about subverting moral norms and conditioning people to accept and tolerate things such as the lowering of the age of consent later on. There are deviant people in positions of power that want their behaviour to be seen as less deviant now that it is becoming common knowledge what they have been up to. Once you accept gay marriage and gays adopting etc, then you know you are at the stage where almost anything is permitted. Then these people have no reason to fear the law or act in fear. It is good that people want to share their lives together, but I think the rush to get this all passed, is intentional and has ulterior motives. Society functioned better when government was more for people and family instead of corporations and broken families. That much is fairly obvious. We should be very careful as we know what works but do the opposite with the financial systems, morality, wars, destruction of the family etc.

"Once you accept gay marriage and gays adopting etc, then you know you are at the stage where almost anything is permitted"

What a daft thing to say. You are making links that are just not there and jumping to conclusions in order to bolster what is an incredibly feeble argument. You link deviancy and homosexuality when in reality A gay person living in denial would be the deviant one. You do realise that child abusers are very often married straight man who trumpet the same family values bullshit that you try and ram down our throats every day ? The idea that feminism sneaked in under the guise of women's liberation and this allowed corporations to reduce wages and governments to make children wards of state is another load of bollocks. What are you suggesting ? That women should not have been afforded the right to work ? That men are superior to women? That Gay people have an agenda, where they want everyone else to be gay,and can somehow with propaganda make this happen ? What planet are you on mate?