
Originally Posted by
mikeeod
Ray Robinson: Beat in their prime Kid Gavilán (ATG/HOF), Lamotta (ATG/HOF), Basilio (ATG/HOF), Graziano, Fullmer (ATG/HOF), Fritzie Zivic, Paul Pender and a past his prime Henry Armstrong (ATG/HOF). Look at all of those PRIME ATG/HOFers on his resume.
Hearns: Get your point on age, but the guy had DESTROYED cuevas and every other fighter who got in the ring with him. Look at Tommy's performance in that fight and compare it to the non effort of Canelo in his vs Floyd. Tommy showed multi-dimensions and Canelo didn't show one. That is EXACTLY why I don't consider the Canelo fight a great win for Floyd.
I'd love for someone to explain to me how Graziano, Basilio, Fullmer, Pender, or even Lamotta were more skilled in the ring than guys like Hatton, Corrales, Castillo, De La Hoya, Mosley, ect. I want to hear specifically what they did in the ring that those guys couldn't.
Being in the HOF is a great honor, but it doesn't necessarily denote a specific high standard of skill. To insinuate that one fighter is a tougher opponent than another simply because he is in the HOF is a complete fallacy.
I want someone to explain to me how Gene Fullmer was a better fighter than Ricky Hatton.
I want someone to explain to me why a 34 year old Hank Armstrong is better than a 35 year old Manny Pacquiao.
When I bring this stuff up, everyone suddenly gets quiet. I'm not saying I'm this boxing genius who has all the right answers, but I've watched all these guys and formed my own opinions - right or wrong. If you want to just regurgitate the opinions of others or tell me stats of who is in the HOF, just save your time. If you want to have an actual discussion about it, let's go.
Bookmarks