Re: gay marriage in the US
GB: Unlike politics where I think I can bring facts to an allegorical discussion,, this topic is more or less opinion driven at least perspective at best.
Meaning: I can't really deride your comments, though I don't agree with them on whole. I'll end it like this your quote: publicly declare their love thru reading out some marriage vows, is not about to make the whole system collapse, IMHO.
You are correct, 100%. Perspective or fact wise.
I think I used too many examples and carried myself away from my original intent. In your own way- U pointed it out!
To end it like I meant: which was to make a connection of the institution of marriage & how it is recognized.
Where does marriage begin and end? Does government licensing, really make it legit?
To me:Civil marriage/union seems to meet the needs of those wanting to marry-without the sanctity of a God- that prohibits same sex relationships.
civil unions being: marriage without religious content carried out by a government institution in accordance with the marriage laws. Civil unions that allow benefits from spouse to spouse, how is that not enough?
(not looking for a response bro- just stating where I stand, rhetorically)
I can't see gays reading vows from a book called bible as anything other than slapping the God of the book in his face. He told them: laying with the same sex is detestable.
--at that point I went off subject by trying to prove that once governments intervene in such issues-its not long before that nation begins to condone/legalize other actions once considered taboo or wrong----will also become the norm.
I digressed then and now. Peace.
Last edited by SlimTrae; 08-15-2015 at 05:00 AM.
All's lost! Everything's going to shit!
Bookmarks