What was wrong with Huck vs Glowacki?
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
What was wrong with Huck vs Glowacki?
Forum P4P Champ
Array
Those were C-class fighters..Originally Posted by beenKOed
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Funny, I didn't have a C-class reaction to it. I enjoyed the hell out of it!😇Those were C-class fighters..
Original & Best
Array
Re: shame on modern boxers
Honestly (and I KNOW I'm in the minority) but I actually enjoyed the Tarver fight moreThose were C-class fighters..
Last edited by Jimanuel Boogustus; 08-18-2015 at 04:26 PM.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Everybody is entitled to their own opinion but I can't understand how you can say that.Honestly (and I KNOW I'm in the minority) but I actually enjoyed the Tarver fight moreThose were C-class fighters..
I'm not asking for an argument (or wanting one), just saying what I think.
Original & Best
Array
Re: shame on modern boxers
Yeah, no of course, I get that.Everybody is entitled to their own opinion but I can't understand how you can say that.Honestly (and I KNOW I'm in the minority) but I actually enjoyed the Tarver fight moreThose were C-class fighters..
I'm not asking for an argument (or wanting one), just saying what I think.
I don't really find slow paced fights boring.
Tarver wasn't running or spoiling, he was doing all his body would let him do. Tarver fought to win man. He really did!
I think there was still a good a mount of skill on show. Tarver was setting traps and must have been disappointed that he didn't have enough power to at least drop Cunningham once, albeit it set up a very tense finish with the 12th round effectively deciding the result of the contest.
For the record though, I'm not saying I didn't like the Huck fight
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks