MARGARITO divorced his HS sweetheart and making a comeback !!!!

[TitoFan]

A person defending a fighter because they happen to be friends, and because..... (cough) "he's a nice guy"..... doesn't amount to diddly squat when it comes to proving that fighter's innocence or lack of guilt as it were. For this person to be crying foul, or conspiracy, or kangaroo court, whatever.... is both laughable and a travesty. Maybe if a convicted cheater was my personal friend and I knew both him and his wife... maybe I'd behave in the same transparent, biased, blind, totally subjective manner.

.... but I would hope not.

[C.J.Rock]

A person defending a fighter because they happen to be friends, and because..... (cough) "he's a nice guy"..... doesn't amount to diddly squat when it comes to proving that fighter's innocence or lack of guilt as it were. For this person to be crying foul, or conspiracy, or kangaroo court, whatever.... is both laughable and a travesty. Maybe if a convicted cheater was my personal friend and I knew both him and his wife... maybe I'd behave in the same transparent, biased, blind, totally subjective manner.

.... but I would hope not.

All I have ever said from day one is.......


Show me one iota of proof, not accusations but proof, that Tony Margarito EVER tried to load his gloves & I'd be all over him like a cheap suit calling for a permanent ban but no one has been able to do that.
As for it being a kangaroo court? It was a perfect example of one..
The CSAC banned Margarito on the word of Nazim Richardson. They accused Margarito of cheating making them the prosecution they had no proof of any cheating tho.
Margarito was banned for 2 years by the prosecuter not by any court. The CSAC had nothing to show any court but Margarito was STILL deemed guilty & had his reputation tarnished & his career railroaded.. Margarito never was given a chance to defend himself. the Csac just said " You look guilty so you must be guilty
That is a Kangaroo court

[ruthless rocco]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
z
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzz
zz

[ruthless rocco]

Let's think about other professions where one can "accidentally" insert a "used" item...

Can a dentist accidentally fit someone with a used filling? How about a chef accidentally preparing and serving a used steak dinner? A nurse accidentally putting a baby in a used diaper?

The concept is ridiculous because used fillings, diapers, steak dinners AND gauze pads are clearly identifiable as used -- not to mention fucking gross!

It's a pathetic bullshit excuse and the apologists have to be morons to believe it!