Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Groves's Loss. What does it do to Froch's "Legacy"?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,056
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    832
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Groves's Loss. What does it do to Froch's "Legacy"?

    Nothing.

    Groves- got a lucky punch in on Froch #1 = Got a gift decision on DeGale #1 = Got splattered in Froch #2 = and is now where he should have been at Froch #1, and that is a guy that was developing but rushed too quickly for his own good.

    Groves had no business in the ring with Froch anyways. So, Froch is cool...
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    946
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    837
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Groves's Loss. What does it do to Froch's "Legacy"?

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Nothing.

    Groves- got a lucky punch in on Froch #1 = Got a gift decision on DeGale #1 = Got splattered in Froch #2 = and is now where he should have been at Froch #1, and that is a guy that was developing but rushed too quickly for his own good.

    Groves had no business in the ring with Froch anyways. So, Froch is cool...
    Bit harsh there on groves he must of been landing lucky punches all night then cause he beat him up for the first 6 or so rounds and he beat degale I remember watching it. Are you implying it was a robbery ?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,401
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    772
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Nothing.

    Groves- got a lucky punch in on Froch #1 = Got a gift decision on DeGale #1 = Got splattered in Froch #2 = and is now where he should have been at Froch #1, and that is a guy that was developing but rushed too quickly for his own good.

    Groves had no business in the ring with Froch anyways. So, Froch is cool...
    No business in the ring with Froch?
    So how come it took so long for Froch to finish him off in both fights?
    I ask you to rewatch the 6th round of the 1st fight and then tell me Groves landed a lucky punch?
    So if Groves is so shit, why is it a big deal that Froch beat him?
    See, this is exactly what I mean.
    Maybe Froch ain't so "cool"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Groves's Loss. What does it do to Froch's "Legacy"?

    Groves lost a close PTS decision to a prime fighter in his backyard. Froch decapitated him their rematch then retired. You could argue it highlights the superior class Froch was operating at.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1344
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Groves's Loss. What does it do to Froch's "Legacy"?

    You could argue that Froch took a lot out of Groves as well, and just had a bad night the first time, it kind of looks that way. He's a guy I never rooted for, but I think the early stoppage actually robbed him of a legitimate come from behind spanking honestly, and he probably couldn't have fought much worse that night.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1044
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Nothing.

    Groves- got a lucky punch in on Froch #1 = Got a gift decision on DeGale #1 = Got splattered in Froch #2 = and is now where he should have been at Froch #1, and that is a guy that was developing but rushed too quickly for his own good.

    Groves had no business in the ring with Froch anyways. So, Froch is cool...
    Lucky punches don't exist fella.

    Groves is good but not there yet.

    Froch was great but is exposed against guys like dirrel and Ward

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is "Chunky" ready for Froch, Ward and Groves 2?
    By ykdadamaja in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-29-2015, 02:33 AM
  2. Groves refuses to "sell soul" to fight Froch
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 01-31-2014, 07:09 PM
  3. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 04-19-2009, 06:15 PM
  4. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-19-2008, 12:44 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2006, 08:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing