O'Sullivan - Eubank (WBA full title eliminator) on Joshua - Whyte undercard

[ross]

1.Pro low level fighters do it to earn money

2.If Eubank is hype and bullshit how come he got a score card in his favour over Saunders when no one else could?

3. Eubank is improving.

1. Yes, but it is supplemented usually by a job, it is not their priority , some know they'll never make it, they love the sport as well.
2. Clearly one judge got it wrong, it happens. They clearly got carried away with Eubank's wild haymakers that were all missing. Richie Woodhall was ringside for Radio 5 and he called it for Eubank. Later, when he was on the telly and had re watched it, he changed his mind. Like I say , it happens, but The important thing is 2 got it right. Tell me , do you think Canelo drew with Floyd?
3. You do know Eubank and Saunders are the same age, don't you? Why should he improve any more than Saunders?
I'm sure you won't see it like this, but then again, when have you ever let facts get in the way of a good hype and bullshit story?

Are you for real?

You really honestly think that experience comes from age!!?

Firstly you were talking about improvement not experience. However, I do believe Saunders has gained more experience than Eubank and I don't see why/how that will change as they are the same age and are likely to have the same length of career left.
Still , I'm sure you'll come back with "if,if,if" instead of the facts.

You will see what Eubank does to Spike compared to what Saunders managed.