Europe is too much of a soft touch

[brocktonblockbust]

Walrus is a c*** who does fake driveway paving projects

[walrus]

Walrus is a c*** who does fake driveway paving projects

Brock is now an ex member of my band, I dropped him like Pete Best

[Britkid]

And no doubt you're anti-gun as well correct?

Indeed!

As for the rest of your views; it should be noted, nothing, and I mean nothing has come close to killing the amount of people Capitalism has.

Human rights are a different kettle of fish, that need World wide not State wide consensus.

I have made it clear I would pick a form of Anarcho Syndicalism, because economy it would help a majority, a majority that Capitalism no longer cares for or indeed even serves without State help.

[El Kabong]

So you feel not protecting property rights and giving government more power would be part of this answer.

Yes, ultimately no one would 'own' property, it should eventually 'belong' to the 'syndicate', but initially that would be the state, as a part of an interim Socialist Federation. More 'government power' would occur, but under a form of Direct Democracy.

So.....mob rule is best?

In general terms, yes.

Mob rule is how individuals of a minority status be it economic, race, creed, sexual orientation, religion, etc get demonized to the point where the majority see no harm in killing off the "non-believers" those who do not assimilate. That's how you get your Holocausts, your Holomodors, your Great Leap Forwards, that's how you get leaders that say "1 death is a tragedy, a million deaths are but a statistic".


Rule of Law, property rights, limited government, liberty...those are very important concepts that direct democracies/mob rule do not value.


And no doubt you're anti-gun as well correct?

Indeed!

I'm not surprised.


Historically that kind of idea/political set up has lead to millions upon millions of deaths

[Britkid]

I'm not surprised.


Historically that kind of idea/political set up has lead to millions upon millions of deaths

More people, on average, are killed by a gun in ten hours in the US than in the entire year of 2014 in the UK. That seems pretty damning of your country's gun culture to me.

And that you seem to bring it up time and again... Have some confidence in yourself, I accept you are a man, you do not need a gun to prove that!

[walrus]

And no doubt you're anti-gun as well correct?

Indeed!

As for the rest of your views; it should be noted, nothing, and I mean nothing has come close to killing the amount of people Capitalism has.

Human rights are a different kettle of fish, that need World wide not State wide consensus.

I have made it clear I would pick a form of Anarcho Syndicalism, because economy it would help a majority, a majority that Capitalism no longer cares for or indeed even serves without State help.

On that one you are wrong, Mao and Stalin alone killed far more than any capitalist regime, I'm surprised you would make that statement

[Britkid]

And no doubt you're anti-gun as well correct?

Indeed!

As for the rest of your views; it should be noted, nothing, and I mean nothing has come close to killing the amount of people Capitalism has.

Human rights are a different kettle of fish, that need World wide not State wide consensus.

I have made it clear I would pick a form of Anarcho Syndicalism, because economy it would help a majority, a majority that Capitalism no longer cares for or indeed even serves without State help.

On that one you are wrong, Mao and Stalin alone killed far more than any capitalist regime, I'm surprised you would make that statement

Come on; Stalin and Mao were not directly involved in both world wars. They were not involved in for lack of a better term, the Modern Crusades. They were not directly involved (but no doubt proxy) in Korea or Vietnam. They were not alive for the Balkan slaughters of the 90s. They were not born/too young to be involved in the horrors of the British Empire in the 18/19th Century. Or France's, Germany's and indeed America's attempts to grab/control land in the 19th and 20th Centuries. They did not get involved in Ireland's Independence battles with the UK, or the struggles of the 'then' India and African countries attempts to gain independence.

Mao and Stalin were indeed responsible for the death of Millions, but Capitalism is in a completely different league when it comes to killing their enemies...

[brocktonblockbust]

@Britkid

I feel I know you intimately for the past six or seven years

[brocktonblockbust]

@<a href="http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingforum/member.php?u=17199" target="_blank">Britkid</a>

I feel I know you intimately for the past six or seven years

I will steamroller you Steve. You know nothing of which you speak. Be ashamed. You know your ontology is way off. Now enjoy this.....you pudding

[El Kabong]

And no doubt you're anti-gun as well correct?

Indeed!

As for the rest of your views; it should be noted, nothing, and I mean nothing has come close to killing the amount of people Capitalism has.

Human rights are a different kettle of fish, that need World wide not State wide consensus.

I have made it clear I would pick a form of Anarcho Syndicalism, because economy it would help a majority, a majority that Capitalism no longer cares for or indeed even serves without State help.

On that one you are wrong, Mao and Stalin alone killed far more than any capitalist regime, I'm surprised you would make that statement

Come on; Stalin and Mao were not directly involved in both world wars. They were not involved in for lack of a better term, the Modern Crusades. They were not directly involved (but no doubt proxy) in Korea or Vietnam. They were not alive for the Balkan slaughters of the 90s. They were not born/too young to be involved in the horrors of the British Empire in the 18/19th Century. Or France's, Germany's and indeed America's attempts to grab/control land in the 19th and 20th Centuries. They did not get involved in Ireland's Independence battles with the UK, or the struggles of the 'then' India and African countries attempts to gain independence.

Mao and Stalin were indeed responsible for the death of Millions, but Capitalism is in a completely different league when it comes to killing their enemies...

Hahahahahaha

[walrus]

And no doubt you're anti-gun as well correct?

Indeed!

As for the rest of your views; it should be noted, nothing, and I mean nothing has come close to killing the amount of people Capitalism has.

Human rights are a different kettle of fish, that need World wide not State wide consensus.

I have made it clear I would pick a form of Anarcho Syndicalism, because economy it would help a majority, a majority that Capitalism no longer cares for or indeed even serves without State help.

On that one you are wrong, Mao and Stalin alone killed far more than any capitalist regime, I'm surprised you would make that statement

Come on; Stalin and Mao were not directly involved in both world wars. They were not involved in for lack of a better term, the Modern Crusades. They were not directly involved (but no doubt proxy) in Korea or Vietnam. They were not alive for the Balkan slaughters of the 90s. They were not born/too young to be involved in the horrors of the British Empire in the 18/19th Century. Or France's, Germany's and indeed America's attempts to grab/control land in the 19th and 20th Centuries. They did not get involved in Ireland's Independence battles with the UK, or the struggles of the 'then' India and African countries attempts to gain independence.

Mao and Stalin were indeed responsible for the death of Millions, but Capitalism is in a completely different league when it comes to killing their enemies...

Hahahahahaha

Mao alone killed more of his own people than died in ww 2. Stalin was just as sick

[Britkid]

Mao alone killed more of his own people than died in ww 2. Stalin was just as sick

I would not doubt that; but neither compares to Capitalism. And despite its initial benefits, its mechanisms are such, it takes killing humans to a whole new level; that no other known 'ism' has come close to.

[walrus]

Mao alone killed more of his own people than died in ww 2. Stalin was just as sick

I would not doubt that; but neither compares to Capitalism. And despite its initial benefits, its mechanisms are such, it takes killing humans to a whole new level; that no other known 'ism' has come close to.

I don't know britkid. I don't see capitalism as the killer. May be the battle between the isms has more fault. Perhaps you are suggesting capitalism kills in order to keep capital flowing? Communism kills in order to maintain centralized power.I think we are wandering off the topic itself and blaming the institution instead of the sickness of man. You are much more versed in communism than I. What do you think Lenin would think of the two major communist countries that were founded and how they were founded and maintained. I can't see how you agree with me that Mao killed more people to maintain his communist regime than were killed in ww 2 and yet fall back on capitalism as the worst killer. Between Mao and Stalin we are talking over 100 million dead people. Beats capitalism hands down. Still, if Mao and Stalin were more interested in achieving a true communist country rather than a stranglehold on power perhaps it would have been different. Communism allowed these idiots to do what they did as they hid behind a power structure that allowed this to happen. No, capitalism is not a perfect system but I would not put a label of murderer upon it. Wars have been happening on this planet long before capitalism or communism came about. After millennia of warfare and killing to call capitalism the culprit seems shortsighted.

[ryanman]

I just meant to quote him not change his post. Sorry and bye.

[ryanman]

Soft touch this you overflowing pudding.