My take is that it was a shit performance from Wlad. He underestimated Tyson Fury and Tyson Fury took advantage of it. Anyone can have a bad fight at any point in time, I think a rematch could go differently in that Fury might gun for a knockout which could change things for better or worse for him.
Being on top of the mountain is easy.....it's the staying there that's the difficult part. We'll see how Tyson Fury copes with NOT being an underdog anymore and getting more challenges placed in his way.
"Being on top of the mountain is easy.....it's the staying there that's the difficult part."
That sums it up pretty much....you fight bout after bout not really getting a good hard challenge and maybe you get complacent after oooooooh I don't know, 10 years or so of being on top.
But here's a question at YOU Brockton, and I know you'll just be thrilled to answer.....The corrupt officials in boxing that were the SOLE cause of Klitschko's long reign (your words, not mine)...how did they come to the decision that it was time for Fury to have the titles? I mean since those corrupt people DO run boxing....right Brockton?
Again, Fury won NOT due to officials deciding to "pass the cash cow torch" ( which by the way I never said but you may be confusing me with Ross or somebody else)( I DID say that the referees or the judges favored klit in his fights in terms of allowing him to foul and not be deducted any points) but because Tyson Fury won the fight by such a wide margin I mean let's think about it if he hadn't been deducted that point the scores were actually 116-112 that is a blow out considering he was such a bum and wladimir was such an "all-time great" ( I think the world can see now what a crock of crap that characterization of Klitschko was haha but I digress) that the judges or the officials had no choice but to award the victory to Tyson.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks