Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
fair enough, and fair question back at ya: how can someone underestimate a "total bum", as you yourself had characterized Tyson Fury?
"Being on top of the mountain is easy.....it's the staying there that's the difficult part."

That sums it up pretty much....you fight bout after bout not really getting a good hard challenge and maybe you get complacent after oooooooh I don't know, 10 years or so of being on top.


But here's a question at YOU Brockton, and I know you'll just be thrilled to answer.....The corrupt officials in boxing that were the SOLE cause of Klitschko's long reign (your words, not mine)...how did they come to the decision that it was time for Fury to have the titles? I mean since those corrupt people DO run boxing....right Brockton?
Fury won the fight fair and square. It wasn't the officials.
Hey, that has constantly been your view "the big money", "the cash cow".....your view only NOW in this special circumstance it isn't....why the change?
Again, Fury won NOT due to officials deciding to "pass the cash cow torch" ( which by the way I never said but you may be confusing me with Ross or somebody else)( I DID say that the referees or the judges favored klit in his fights in terms of allowing him to foul and not be deducted any points) but because Tyson Fury won the fight by such a wide margin I mean let's think about it if he hadn't been deducted that point the scores were actually 116-112 that is a blow out considering he was such a bum and wladimir was such an "all-time great" ( I think the world can see now what a crock of crap that characterization of Klitschko was haha but I digress) that the judges or the officials had no choice but to award the victory to Tyson.